|
Volume 1, No. 2 2000, June
Qualitative Research in Canadian Psychology1)
David L. Rennie, Kimberly D. Watson & Althea Monteiro
Abstract: In response to the first author's
e-mailed depiction of his situation as a qualitative researcher
in a large Canadian department of psychology, Canadian
qualitative researchers in several disciplines were invited to
respond to questions about their situations. A thematic analysis
of the replies revealed that psychologists in departments
affiliated with the faculties of arts and science operate in
greater isolation than do those with affiliated with a faculty of
education. The analysis also indicated that the use of
qualitative research in psychology lags behind its uptake in the
other disciplines with which it was compared. Themes in terms of
responsiveness to the needs of graduate students, departmental
and institutional support, funding and scholarship are presented
and discussed.
Key words: qualitative research, Canadian
psychology, sociology of knowledge
1. Qualitative Research in Canadian Psychology
2. Method
3. Findings
3.1 Psychology
3.2 The other disciplines
4. Conclusion
|
|
Qualitative Research in Canadian Psychology
|
|
There has been an explosion of qualitative research in during
the past two decades (RENNIE, WATSON & MONTEIRO, 2000). But
to what extent has this uptake taken place in psychology? More
narrowly, what is the situation in Canadian psychology? As a
discipline, Canadian psychology has taken on the character of
American psychology.2) As in the United States,
university psychology departments are usually affiliated with
either a Faculty of Arts (often in conjunction with
a Faculty of Science) or a Faculty of Education. Although there
are exceptions, a suitable doctorate is necessary for
registration as a psychologist. The graduate programmes leading
to such degrees entail coursework, examinations and/or mandatory
papers and a dissertation. In the case of clinical programmes,
field placements attached to course work and an internship are
required as well. On the way to the doctorate, students in most
graduate programmes must do a Masters degree involving a thesis
or research project. Courses in statistics and experimental
design are required in most, if not all, departments of
psychology in this country. [1]
Thus, Canadian psychology has followed the American way of
making psychology both scientific and professional. Among the
social sciences, it is especially ardent about its adoption of
positivism and the natural scientific method going with it.
Correspondingly, it can be expected to be resistant to radical
departures from accustomed research practice, such as the use of
qualitative research methods. This is truer of psychology in
general than of educational psychology, however, and within the
latter, of counselling psychology in particular. In any case,
the tension created by the two approaches to enquiry makes for an
interesting sociology of knowledge. A number of questions are
raised: How isolated are psychologists using qualitative
research? What types of qualitative research do they use? What
about grant support for qualitative research? How easy is it to
publish qualitative research? What are the faculty resources for
meeting students' demands for qualitative research? [2]
In an attempt to get answers to these and related questions,
we surveyed Canadian psychologists doing qualitative research.
Moreover, to provide a context for the situation in psychology,
we approached qualitative researchers in a number of other
disciplines as well. As will be seen, we got more responses from
the aggregate of sister disciplines than we got from psychology
itself. Nevertheless, in keeping with the theme of this issue of
the Journal, we shall focus mainly on psychology. [3]
In conducting our enquiry, we were open to learning of
qualitative research being conducted in applied settings as well
as in the academy. As it turned out, however, almost all of the
investigators we found in the literature or through the network
were located in academic settings. Accordingly, academic
concerns were often reflected in their reports, as will become
evident in what follows. [4]
|
|
As part of the larger study of the rise of English-language
qualitative research since 1950 (RENNIE, WATSON & MONTEIRO,
2000), we used the PsycINFO electronic database to search
the key words, 'qualitative research',
'grounded theory', phenomenological
psychology', and 'discourse analysis'. From
this output we located authors of qualitative research books,
chapters, and articles. For the present study, we isolated 44
Canadian contributors from several disciplines. The first author
drafted a letter giving a case history of his involvement with
the grounded theory form of qualitative research, describing his
situation of being one of the few qualitative researchers in a
large department of psychology affiliated with the Faculties of
Arts and Science. This description addressed matters pertaining
to collegial, departmental, and funding support of his work;
students' pressure for qualitative research and
responsiveness to it; and departmental attitudes to qualitative
research as expressed in hiring practices. This description set
the framework for the kind of information we were interested in.
Nevertheless, to simplify the participants' task, he ended
the letter with the request that they reply to three questions:
What approach to qualitative research do they use? To what
extent do they use it as opposed to more traditional approaches
to research? And to what extent do their settings support and
express qualitative research? As it turned out, many
participants not only answered these questions, they did so
within the framework of their case histories. All correspondence
was conducted by e-mail. [5]
Some participants from disciplines other
than psychology disputed a comment in the prologue to the letter
suggesting that the number of qualitative researchers were
"few in number". They remarked that this might be
the case in psychology but it certainly is not so in their
disciplines. They suggested other databases to supplement
PsycINFO and additional people to contact. We took up a
number of these leads and eventually wrote to another 48
individuals. Overall, we received replies from 8 qualitative
researchers in arts/science psychology, 7 in educational
psychology3), 15 in nursing, 5 in education, 6
in sociology, 4 in medicine-related appointments/settings, 3 in
social work, 2 in environmental studies, and 1 each in
women's studies and nursing, medicine and psychology, and
family studies and applied nutrition, giving a total of 53. One
of the replies was from a member of a faculty of nursing in a
Quebec university: A colleague had forwarded RENNIE's
letter, prefaced with a brief introduction written in French, to
a number of her francophone colleagues in Quebec who do
qualitative research. This reply, given to us in French, was the
only one to come from this group of qualitative researchers.
Thus, again, this study is limited to anglophone qualitative
research in Canada (see endnote 1). Exclusive of the Quebec
group, then, the return rate was 57%. [6]
Once the returns were in, MONTEIRO summarised each reply in
terms of a number of categories: research (area, and amount
done), type of method used, support (institutional,
departmental), classroom presence (coursework offered by the
department), student involvement (theses, dissertations,
supervision), and funding (internal and external sources).
Alternatively, WATSON divided the replies into arts/science +
educational psychology vs. those from the other disciplines, then
quoted responses in terms of the approaches used; extent of use
(personal and departmental); internal support (colleagues,
courses, funding); and students (theses, dissertations). With
these analyses in hand to aid his own interpretation of the
replies, RENNIE drafted a write-up, which was conjointly revised
and sent to the participants via e-mail for commentary. The
comments received were then taken into consideration in the
writing of the final manuscript. [7]
|
|
The present study has led us to believe that the majority of
arts/science graduate programmes in psychology in this country do
not have any qualitative researchers on faculty and that, for
those that do, the numbers are small. Moreover, in Canada there
are proportionately more graduate programmes in arts/science
psychology than in educational psychology. As for the latter
(and particularly in the speciality of counselling psychology),
it would appear that almost all of them have qualitative
researchers on staff, and in considerable numbers in some places.
[8]
Arts/science psychology
There is a pattern among the replies by the psychologists in
the arts/science departments. These academics generally began
their careers expressing the traditional or
'quantitative' approach to enquiry in which they had
been trained, then gradually turned to the alternative approach.
Usually, this turn was made only after securing tenure. Whether
in response to it, or contributory to it, the turn was
intricately involved in students' wishes. Students have
often been ahead of their professors in recognising the potential
of qualitative research. This situation has created a dilemma
for faculty members making the turn. On the one hand, they are
gratified by students' demands and want to accommodate
them. On the other hand, given that students typically have
3-person supervisory committees for their theses and
dissertations, those faculty members doing qualitative research
may be hard pressed to find colleagues who can understand and
support the methodology. As one psychologist in this kind of
department remarked, "I pick internal readers for theses
carefully". [9]
Most of these participants indicated that, over time, some of
their colleagues have developed an interest in qualitative
research, again, usually in response to pressure from their
students. Once this 'spread effect' occurs, it is
easier to get appropriate committee members for students'
theses and dissertations. But this development itself is
two-edged. Although the lives of the students wanting to do
qualitative research are made easier, ironically the lives of the
faculty members who do qualitative research can be more difficult
because their colleagues who have been awakened to the approach
may not consider themselves competent to supervise it. Thus,
they agree to allow their students to do a qualitative research
study so long as a qualitative researcher sits on the committee.
This state of affairs can easily dramatically increase the
supervisory load of the qualitative researchers. Meanwhile, of
course, qualitative research and its supervision are both
labour-intensive. Thus, qualitative researchers in arts/science
psychology departments work very hard. [10]
In terms of the methods used, two participants do
phenomenology, although not exclusively. One of these
phenomenologists supplements the qualitative method with
quantitative analyses while the other uses quantitative methods
as well as phenomenology depending on the study undertaken.
Another participant described her approach as a kind of theme
analysis involving both description and interpretation that takes
into account immediate and larger contexts, commenting that it is
probably a form of discourse analysis. A third depicted his
approach as the use of interview material to generate thick and
thin descriptions. A fourth indicated that she works within a
social constructionist epistemological framework, drawing mainly
on discourse analysis and grounded theory. Finally, one person
writing in indicated that he is using a discourse analytic
approach along the lines developed in the United Kingdom,
especially the work of POTTER and WETHERELL (1987). [11]
The members of arts/science psychology departments reported
that qualitative research is supported passively by their
departments and that, in a way, this is good enough. The
security of tenure and the norm of academic freedom allow them to
do what they want to do and they can even flourish. None
indicated that his or her department championed the cause of
qualitative research, however. Many reported having successfully
gotten qualitative research methodology into the graduate student
curriculum but only as an elective course. As for the hiring of
new faculty, it has happened that a new member has been hired
precisely because he or she is a qualitative researcher, but only
rarely. More typically, new appointments are made in terms of
the area of specialisation that the department wishes to fill,
rather than in terms of the approach to research used by the
applicant. Applicants using the conventional approaches to
enquiry, and publishing in mainstream journals as a result, build
more impressive curriculum vitae than their qualitative
research brethren, and usually win the contests. [12]
None of the psychologists in this first group reported any
difficulties publishing. Indeed some gave lengthy lists of their
relevant publications (and the same was true of many participants
in the other disciplines surveyed as well). Few of these
publications are in regular issues of flagship mainstream
journals, however, although some have appeared in Special
Issues/Sections on qualitative research published by such
journals. There was relatively more commentary on funding. Most
reported that they have received satisfactory support from their
home institutions, subject to the limitation that such funding is
always of a minor nature. Major grant proposals must be directed
to external agencies. In Canada, there are three federal
granting agencies, among which social scientists apply mainly to
the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).
(These agencies are currently undergoing reorganisation and a
re-naming). This agency is organised into a number of committees
addressing the various social science disciplines. All of the
participants who had dealt with the Psychology Committee gave a
tale of woe. A number opined that the members of the committee
usually do not know anything about qualitative research
methodology and so evaluate proposals according to the
conventional criteria. Finally seeing the light, some have
switched to SSHRC's Interdisciplinary Committee, with
greater success. [13]
Educational psychology
Educational psychology is a broad discipline that covers a
number of specialities, such as early childhood education,
learning disabilities, and counselling psychology. The replies
of the participants from this discipline were also quite
consistent but in a different direction than those of the
arts/science psychologists. The former reported comparatively
much greater departmental support for qualitative research. One
participant indicated that practically all of her colleagues in
her department are qualitative researchers. Another revealed
that her work is about 40% qualitative and that this proportion
was in keeping with the use of qualitative research in her
department as a whole. [14]
Like the other psychologists we contacted, this group
collectively uses a broad array of methods. Only one appears to
use a single approach (grounded theory). Others draw on
different methods, whether phenomenology and narrative analysis,
or critical incident, narrative, hermeneutic and action theory
approaches, or (unspecified) qualitative and quantitative
approaches. [15]
Overall, these psychologists did not convey the struggle, to
find a place for themselves as qualitative researchers within
their academic communities, seen in the replies of the
psychologists located in art/science departments. Two of the
educational psychology settings figuring in the reports have
taken initiatives to form interdisciplinary interest groups to
facilitate communication among qualitative researchers and to
serve as resource pools. Indeed, some of these participants took
pains to point out that the kind of situation depicted in
RENNIE's letter is certainly not typical of their
situation. Still, the norm of positivism affects these
educational psychologists as well. One worried that allowing
graduate students to work solely within qualitative research
could jeopardise their careers. Another indicated that she has
had difficulty publishing in mainstream counselling psychology
journals because their editors and reviewers often impose
conventional criteria on her works. [16]
As for funding, although one participant reported getting good
support from external granting agencies for her qualitative
research proposals, another indicated that building a
quantitative component into her proposals seemed to be needed.
These participants were, of course, reporting mainly on
applications to agencies and adjudicating committees that are
pertinent to their own discipline. [17]
|
|
Prior to this study, the frequency of 'hits' for
our search terms directed to PsycINFO had alerted us to
some unexpected differences among disciplines other than
psychology in terms of the uptake of qualitative research. We
found the uptake by sociology to be less than expected and the
adoption by many health disciplinesespecially nursingto
be greater than expected. These trends are played out in the
replies from our participants in disciplines other than
psychology. [18]
More than in psychology, sociology's tradition of doing
field work as well as its kinship with anthropology have prepared
the ground for acceptance of qualitative research. In Canada, an
international conference on qualitative research was instituted
by a Canadian sociologist more than a decade ago and continues to
have wide appeal. Qualitative research is reported to have a
good presence at mainstream sociology conferences as well.
Nevertheless, one participant from this discipline gave the
opinion that the uptake of the approach in sociology departments
across the country is spotty, and tends to be present in the
newer universities that are comparatively less bound by
tradition. In a similar vein, another participant estimated that
only 30 of the 1000 or so sociologists in the country do
qualitative research although, he added, this work has weight.
Meanwhile, we received mixed messages from the sociologists
responding to our survey regarding the extent to which the two
main Canadian sociology journals seem to be resistant to
publishing qualitative research. [19]
As for method, one sociologist reported that, although he is
"completely inductive and discovery-oriented", there
are, in his discipline, enormous variations in what people
consider to be qualitative research, ranging from open-ended
questions on survey questionnaires to "generally solid
qualitative researchers". He indicated that, in his own
department, most of his colleagues who believe they are doing
qualitative research rely on quantification and are actually
doing content analysis. Another respondent reported that she is
just one of two members of her department who are qualitative
researchers and that, among the two, she is the only one doing
empirical work. She reported difficulty publishing in both
mainstream sociology journals and in qualitative research
journalsin the first instance because the work is
qualitative, in the second because it is not postmodern (!).
Among those responding to our survey, most indicated that they
draw on symbolic interactionism and related grounded theory and
ethnographic approaches, although one indicated that she feels
more secure when supporting her qualitative research with
quantified analyses. [20]
Overall, it has been difficult to get a clear picture of the
situation in this discipline. From what we can see, it appears
that qualitative research in sociology is somewhat more
established than in arts/science psychology. [21]
As for the other disciplines represented by our respondents,
those in education seem to be in settings that are quite
comfortable with qualitative research. Certainly, some of them
are engaging in highly imaginative, creative methods, such as
performative works of various sorts, that would have difficulty
finding a place in even the most liberal of departments of
psychology. Then there is York University's
inter-disciplinary Faculty of Environmental Studies, in which
most of its members are qualitative researchers doing and
inspiring their students to do imaginative projects. An example
coming from the work of one of the respondents from there is her
use of photography of environments as part of participatory
action research to reduce the opportunities for urban crime.
[22]
Dominant in the field of qualitative research in Canada,
however, is the discipline of nursing. More than any other
group, it was the nurses among our respondents who expressed an
uproar in response to our observation that the qualitative
researchers in this country are few in number. This mode of
enquiry has been taken up in this discipline to the point where
it is, at a minimum in most settings, on par with positivistic
approaches. The reasons given for the popularity of qualitative
research methods in nursing have to do with the
discipline's interest in developing knowledge that is
usable for clinical practice. In particular, there is an
interest in understanding patients' experiences of
undergoing various medical procedures in order to increase
clinical wisdom and make a positive impact on the conduct of
those same procedures. One participant observed nursing is
unlike the social sciences in this regard, which she considered
to be unduly theory-driven and reductionistic. [23]
Two of the participants from nursing are editors of
qualitative health research journals. These journals lead all
others by a large margin as sources of the 'hits' in
our search termsespecially grounded theoryin
the PsycINFO data base. Also, an institute of qualitative
research has been founded at the University of Alberta, and has a
number of international sites. This institute serves as an
inter-disciplinary training and resources centre. [24]
In summary, the status of qualitative research in Canada is
uneven. Of those disciplines represented in our responses,
arts/science psychology is most resistant to the uptake of the
approach. The number of departments that have qualitative
researchers among their faculty is small, and such faculty
members constitute an extreme minority within their departments.
Their impact on their departments outweighs their minority
status, however, by virtue of hard work in response to
students' demands for the approach. Moreover, interest in
it has spread to other colleagues, although not to the point
where it has become a broad movement within such departments.
Also, although difficulty securing external funding is
experienced, most of the respondents appear satisfied with their
career progress: They are allowed locally to do what they want to
do, and they appear to be publishing to their satisfaction albeit
not, by and large in "top" mainstream journal outlets. The
discipline of education and its sub-discipline, educational
psychology, are comparatively much more sanguine about
qualitative research, as reflected in much larger complements of
qualitative research faculty members in university departments,
and active research groups. Sociology seems to be between
arts/science psychology and education. The discipline of nursing
has exceeded the other disciplines addressed in the survey in
terms of its application of qualitative research. Finally, we
heard from a scattering of interdisciplinary respondents, often
associated in some way with a health discipline, who also
reported subscription to the approach. [25]
|
|
Once knowledge is defined by method, then institutions of
power (university curricula and hiring practices, criteria used
by granting agencies, editorial policies of journals, etc) are
organised to materialise the definition. From then on, claims to
knowledge based on alternative methods are either ignored or
dismissed. For whatever reason, it is apparent that positivism
has held the disciplines of education and nursing in a looser
grip than it has held arts/science psychology and sociology.
Correspondingly, it is easier for the former to claim that the
returns from a methodological challenge to positivismqualitative researchconstitute knowledge. In the same
token, institutional support, although not total by any means,
has come into being in these disciplines more than has been the
case in arts/science psychology. [26]
It is also the case, however, that the situation within
arts/science psychology is mixed as well. Although resistances
to their approach are encountered both inside and outside these
academic departments, by virtue of being protected by tenure,
qualitative researchers are at least tolerated by departmental
colleagues. Moreover, the interest in the approach shown not
only by students but also by some colleagues as well means that
qualitative researchers are spreading an uptake of the approach
that should accumulate over time. Nevertheless, the situation is
such that we do not foresee a pronounced shift in the way
arts/science Canadian psychology as a whole prefers to do enquirycertainly not in the near future. [27]
1) This study was supported by the Faculty
of Arts, York University. Correspondence may be directed to
David RENNIE, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3, E-mail: drennie@yorku.ca.
<back>
2) This may be truer of Canadian anglophone
psychology than of francophone psychology. Quebec francophone
educational institutions are, of course, situated in their French
origins. We lack sufficient familiarity with the Quebec
francophone university scene to be able to tell whether or not
the picture given here is typical of departments of psychology
there. Nevertheless, the francophone research articles published
in bilingual, Canadian psychology journals are based on the same
kind of research methods seen in American journals. <back>
3) We have a sense that the sub-discipline
of community psychology is more open to qualitative research than
in most other sub-disciplines in psychology and, indeed, the one
community psychologist writing in supported this impression.
Nevertheless, we are naturally reluctant to generalise from that
one report, and have pooled it into those from educational
psychology. <back>
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse analysis and
social psychology. London: Sage.
Rennie, D.L., Watson, K.D., & Monteiro, A. (2000). The rise of qualitative research. Manuscript in preparation.
David RENNIE is a Professor of Psychology at York University,
Toronto, Canada. His main research interests are in grounded
theory methodology and its application to the client's experience
of psychotherapy. He is author of "Person-centred counselling:
An experiential approach" (1998), and co-editor of both
"Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative
approaches" (1992) and "Qualitative psychotherapy research:
Methods and methodology" (forthcoming).
E-mail:
drennie@yorku.ca
Kimberly WATSON is a doctoral student in clinical
psychology at York University. Her research interests include
qualitative methodology, the subjective experiences of
qualitative researchers, and qualitative psychotherapy research
with people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.
E-mail:
kwatson@yorku.ca
Althea MONTERIO is a M.A student in the Clinical
Psychology Program at York University. Her main interests are
cross-cultural psychology, and multicultural counselling.
E-mail:
althea@yesic.com
Please cite this article as follows (and include paragraph numbers if necessary):
Rennie, David L., Watson, Kimberly D., & Monteiro, Althea
(2000, June). Qualitative Research in Canadian Psychology [27
paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum:
Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 1(2). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00rennieetal-e.htm [Date of Access: Month Day, Year].
|
Last update: 02/03/2003
Volume 1, No. 2 Table of Contents
[qualitative-research.net]
[Home] [Inside FQS] [Features]
[Services]
[Submission]
[FAQ] [Advertising] [Search FQS]
[Newsletter]
[Editorial Team]
© 2000 Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research
(ISSN 1438-5627)
|