Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175Keywords:
interviews, computer mediated communication (CMC), face-to-face interview, e-mail interview, MSN messenger interview, telephone interviewAbstract
Face-to-face interviews have long been the dominant interview technique in the field of qualitative research. In the last two decades, telephone interviewing became more and more common. Due to the explosive growth of new communication forms, such as computer mediated communication (for example e-mail and chat boxes), other interview techniques can be introduced and used within the field of qualitative research. For a study in the domain of virtual teams, I used various communication possibilities to interview informants as well as face-to-face interviews. In this article a comparison will be made concerning the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face, telephone, e-mail and MSN messenger interviews. By including telephone and MSN messenger interviews in the comparison, the scope of this article is broader than the article of BAMPTON and COWTON (2002). URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604118Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2006-09-30
How to Cite
Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175
Issue
Section
Single Contributions
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Raymond Opdenakker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.