Reflections on the Process of Conducting Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data Concerning Informed Choice for Young People With a Disability in Transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2300Keywords:
qualitative secondary analysis, qualitative interviews, qualitative longitudinal research, data archives, young people with a disability, informed choice, transitionsAbstract
Secondary analysis of data is seen as a way of maximising the utility of existing research in a non-intrusive way and provides an efficient research strategy at a time of financial constraint. However, there are few examples from the published literature of social science researchers conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data sets. This article reflects on the process of re-using interview transcripts, carried out with young people with a learning disability and their parents on the subject of life choices, held in a United Kingdom qualitative data archive. Secondary analysis of qualitative data, while presenting certain challenges, has much to offer the research community, and is a particularly valuable resource for qualitative research postgraduate students.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Fraser Mitchell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.