Practitioner-Research and the Regulation of Research Ethics: The Challenge of Individual, Organizational, and Social Interests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.528Keywords:
ethics, action research, power/knowledge, politics, feminist researchAbstract
Graduate students who become practitioner-researchers in schools encounter ethical review regulations that highlight the contradictions among individual, organizational and social interests. This paper addresses the problem of practitioners who want to use ethical research methods within the educational organizations where they are employed. I identify how the regulation of research ethics works within networks of power/knowledge relations to restrict knowledge production, and I examine the political nature of the moral philosophical reasoning for these restrictions. In the current context, the regulatory process for the ethical review of human research provides a means for protecting organizational interests and for the self-protection of individuals. I propose that a greater emphasis on the ethical principles of individual human dignity, and justice and inclusiveness would provide moral ground for practitioner-researchers who want to explore the possibilities for social transformation in schools. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs050163Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2005-01-31
How to Cite
Coupal, L. (2005). Practitioner-Research and the Regulation of Research Ethics: The Challenge of Individual, Organizational, and Social Interests. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.528
Issue
Section
FQS Debate: Qualitative Research and Ethics
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Linda Coupal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.