(Hi)stories on (Hi)stories. Historical-Anthropological Fieldwork as Reflexive Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.707Keywords:
reflexivity, fieldwork, history of everyday life, local history, National Socialism, community study, memory, reception of textsAbstract
This article discusses possibilities and limits of reflexive field research as exemplified by a historical-anthropological community study. Such reflexive approaches accept the subjectivity of the researcher as a condition of scientific cognition. In manifold situations the discourse of the researcher on the local history of everyday life in the 20th century in general and especially on the Nazi era clashes with prevailing memory discourses. Such "obstructions" turn out to be opportunities to reflect on the conditions and consequences of the researcher's own practice more adequately. The gained insights in the possibilities of reflexive fieldwork also clarify its limits, e.g. the reader's signifying power over the author's texts. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0302340Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-05-31
How to Cite
Langthaler, E. (2003). (Hi)stories on (Hi)stories. Historical-Anthropological Fieldwork as Reflexive Process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.707
Issue
Section
Thematic Issue
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Ernst Langthaler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.