Agricultural Economics and Qualitative Research: Incompatible Paradigms?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.1.1116Keywords:
agriculture, horticulture, agribusiness, management, qualitative methods, case studyAbstract
The disciplinary paradigm of agricultural economics emphasizes rational behavior in a world constrained by scarce resources. The research practice focuses on the quantitative modeling of optimization behavior. These models, though, only offer limited support to practitioners in solving real-world problems. Qualitative research approaches contribute to this task, particularly with research in developing countries. Participatory action research was introduced in the seventies; case studies have been employed more often and have been discussed more intensively. But different qualitative approaches are hardly known in agricultural economics. However, exemplary theses, published in the series 'Research Reports on Economics in Horticulture', show the successful use of qualitative research methods in German agricultural research. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs000167Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2000-01-31
How to Cite
Bitsch, V. (2000). Agricultural Economics and Qualitative Research: Incompatible Paradigms?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.1.1116
Issue
Section
Disciplinary Examples
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Vera Bitsch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.