Review: Andrea Ploder (2014). Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft? [Qualitative Research as Rigorous Science?]

Authors

  • Uwe Dörk Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut Essen (KWI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.1.2537

Keywords:

Edmund Husserl, reception, reception history, critical reception, qualitative methods, qualitative methodology, qualitative social research, phenomenology

Abstract

The study "Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" [Qualitative Research as Rigorous Science?] critically examines the reception history of Edmund HUSSERL in the German methodological literature of qualitative social research. The book argues that HUSSERL's phenomenology penetrated qualitative research literature predominantly through the work of Alfred SCHÜTZ, although HUSSERL's original work was directly received too. Using a set of defined, a priori criteria, Andrea PLODER carefully plots whether or not HUSSERL's ideas were absorbed. With this study, Andrea PLODER addresses a relevant problem, because understanding (Verstehen) is paradigmatic in qualitative research.

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs160119

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Uwe Dörk, Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut Essen (KWI)

Uwe DÖRK ist Historiker und arbeitet an einem Projekt zur Geschichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie (DGS).

Downloads

Published

2016-01-05

How to Cite

Dörk, U. (2016). Review: Andrea Ploder (2014). Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft? [Qualitative Research as Rigorous Science?]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.1.2537

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016)

Section

FQS Reviews

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Uwe Dörk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.