Research About the Pharmaceutical Industry: Ethical Positioning in a Powerful Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3139Keywords:
ethical self-reflection, social suffering, medical anthropology, pharmaceutical industry, role conflict, TanzaniaAbstract
Taking into account the impact of global power relations with regard to health care, I investigated, as part of a medical-anthropological study, the introduction of a new (now-world-leading) anti-malaria drug in Tanzania. In so doing, I was confronted with human suffering, the experience of mortality (malaria), and conflicts; and I was confronted in a way that raises ethical questions about responsibility, respect, and my own capacities for action. In this article, I reflect on my experiences during the field research with regard to my own ethical positioning in a network of power, which implies different roles, positioning, and (own or external) expectations in a sensitive field of research that may be marked by distrust. Against this background, I make thematic ethical research challenges, standards and problems that are relevant for qualitative research and, more generally, for (medical) anthropology with its transcultural and transdisciplinary problems. I focus, on the one hand, on aspects of confidentiality and transparency—a core element of ethically responsible research—toward informants and participants in the field. On the other hand, I address the question of the influence that doubts about one’s own role as a researcher working in particular environments (here, pharmaceutical industry) can exert on the data collection and the analysis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Caroline Meier zu Biesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.