Digital Data and Methods as Extension of Qualitative Research Processes: Challenges and Potentials Coming From Digital Humanities and Computational Social Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.2.3818Keywords:
digital humanities, computational social sciences, qualitative social research, research process, digital methods, digital data, sociology of knowledge approach to discourseAbstract
Integrating digital data and methods can extend the scope of qualitative social research. However, to date, this has hardly ever happened. Computer and data scientists have already developed tools that could be used as a starting point, but they must be adjusted to the special needs of qualitative research. To explore the limits and possibilities for qualitative social research, it is not only essential to critically analyze digital data and the corresponding methods. Researchers should also reflect on their own perspective. In my contribution, I point to connections to the digital humanities and the computational social sciences. Based on the example of a discourse analysis that followed a sociology of knowledge approach, I model the qualitative research process and demonstrate which steps can be extended with digital methods. Subsequently, I discuss key challenges and point to strengths and possible pathways to show how digital data and methods can be further developed. I lay a foundation for creatively integrating new digital elements into the qualitative research process. I thus shed light on the transformation of research questions, fields, methods, and epistemologies.
Downloads
References
Adelmann, Benedikt & Franken, Lina (2020). Thematic web crawling and scraping as a way to form focussed web archives. In Sharon Healy, Michael Kurzmeier, Helena La Pina & Patricia Duffe (Eds.), Book of abstracts. Engaging with web archives: "Opportunities, Challenges and Potentialities" (#EWAVirtual), Maynooth University Arts and Humanities Institute, Kildare, Ireland, September 21-22 (pp.35-37), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4058013 [Accessed: January 13, 2023].
Adelmann, Benedikt; Franken, Lina; Gius, Evelyn; Krüger, Katharina & Vauth, Michael (2019). Die Generierung von Wortfeldern und ihre Nutzung als Findeheuristik. Ein Erfahrungsbericht zum Wortfeld "medizinisches Personal". In Patrick Sahle (Ed.), Book of abstracts. 6th conference Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (DHd 2019) "Digital Humanities: multimedial & multimodal", Universität Mainz/Universität Frankfurt/M., Germany, March 25-29 (pp.114-16), https://zenodo.org/record/4622122 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Andresen, Melanie & Zinsmeister, Heike (2019). Korpuslinguistik. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
Andresen, Melanie; Begerow, Anke; Franken, Lina; Gaidys, Uta; Koch, Gertraud & Zinsmeister, Heike (2020). Syntaktische Profile für Interpretationen jenseits der Textoberfläche. In Christoph Schöch (Ed.), Konferenzabstracts. 7th conference Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (DHd 2020) "Spielräume. Digital Humanities zwischen Modellierung und Interpretation", Universität Paderborn, Germany, March 2-6 (pp.219-223), https://zenodo.org/record/4621932 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Arbeitsstelle Kleine Fächer (2018). Was ist ein kleines Fach?, https://www.kleinefaecher.de/kartierung/was-ist-ein-kleines-fach.html [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Baker, Paul (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247-256.
Baker, Paul & Levon, Erez (2015). Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 221-236, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568542 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Barad, Karen (2003). Posthumanist performativity. Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801-831.
Barbaresi, Adrien (2019). The vast and the focused. On the need for thematic web and blog corpora. Proceedings, Workshop "Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora" (CMLC 7), Cardiff, UK, July 22, https://doi.org/10.14618/ids-pub-9025 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Bauernschmidt, Stefan (2014). Kulturwissenschaftliche Inhaltsanalyse prozessgenerierter Daten. In Christine Bischoff, Karoline Oehme-Jüngling & Walter Leimgruber (Eds.), Methoden der Kulturanthropologie (pp.415-430). Bern: UTB.
Baur, Nina & Graeff, Peter (2021). Datenqualität und Selektivitäten digitaler Daten. Alte und neue digitale und analoge Datensorten im Vergleich. In Birgit Blättel-Mink (Ed.), Gesellschaft unter Spannung. Verhandlungen des 40. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2020, Berlin/digital, Germany, September 14-24, https://publikationen.soziologie.de/index.php/kongressband_2020/article/view/1362 [Accessed: March 13, 2022].
Beck, Stefan (2009). Vergesst Kultur – wenigstens für einen Augenblick! Oder: Zur Vermeidbarkeit der kulturtheoretischen Engführung ethnologischen Forschens. In Sonja Windmüller, Beate Binder & Thomas Hengartner (Eds.), Kultur – Forschung. Zum Profil einer volkskundlichen Kulturwissenschaft (pp.48-68). Berlin: LIT.
Beck, Stefan (2019 [2015]). Von Praxistheorie 1.0 zu 3.0. Oder: wie analoge und digitale Praxen relationiert werden sollten. Berliner Blätter. Ethnographische und ethnologische Beiträge, 81, 9-27.
Beck, Stefan; Niewöhner, Jörg & Sørensen, Estrid (Eds.) (2012). Science and Technology Studies. Eine sozialanthropologische Einführung. Bielefeld: transcript.
Berkelaar, Brenda L. & Francisco-Revilla, Luis (2018). Motivation, evidence and computation. A research framework for expanding computational social science participation and design. In Cathleen Stützer, Martin Welker & Marc Egger (Eds.), Computational social science in the age of big data. Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp.16-62). Köln: Herbert von Halem.
Blätte, Andreas; Behnke, Joachim; Schnapp, Kai-Uwe & Wagemann, Claudius (Eds.) (2018). Computational Social Science. Die Analyse von Big Data. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Blei, David M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Surveying a suite of algorithms that offer a solution to managing large document archives. Communications of the ACM, 55, 77-84, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~blei/papers/Blei2012.pdf [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Boellstorff, Tom (2016). For whom the ontology turns. Theorizing the digital real. Current Anthropology, 57, 387-406.
boyd, danah & Crawford, Kate (2012). Critical questions for big data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679.
Bubenhofer, Noah (2017). Kollokationen, n-Gramme, Mehrworteinheiten. In Kersten Sven Roth, Martin Wengeler & Alexander Ziem (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft (pp.69-93). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Charmaz, Kathy (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Introducing qualitative methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio (2018). Introduction to computational social science. Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer.
Conte, Rosaria; Gilbert, Nigel; Bonelli, Giulia; Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio; Deffuant, Guillaume; Kertesz, János; Loreto, Vittorio; Moat, Suzy; Nadal, Jean-Pierre; Sánchez, Angel; Nowak, Andrzej; Flache, Andreas; San Miguel, Maxi & Helbing, Dirk (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325-346, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
D'Andrea, Alessia; Ferri, Fernando; Grifoni, Patrizia & Guzzo, Tiziana (2015). Approaches, tools and applications for sentiment analysis implementation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 125(3), 26-33, http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015905866 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Denning, Peter J. & Tedre, Matti (2019). Computational thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dourish, Paul & Gómez Cruz, Edgar (2018). Datafication and data fiction. Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718784083 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Drucker, Johanna (2020). Visualization and interpretation. Humanistic approaches to display. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Evers, Jeanine; Caprioli, Mauro Ugo; Nöst, Stefan & Wiedemann, Gregor (2020). What is the REFI-QDA standard. Experimenting with the transfer of analyzed research projects between QDA software. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(2), Art. 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.2.3439 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Flanders, Julia & Jannidis, Fotis (2016). Data modeling. In Susan Schreibman, Raymond George Siemens & John Unsworth (Eds.), A new companion to digital humanities (pp.229-237). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Flick, Uwe (2007). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Fortun, Kim; Fortun, Mike; Bigras, Erik; Saheb, Tahereh; Costelloe-Kuehn, Brandon; Crowder, Jerome; Price, Daniel & Kenner, Alison (2014). Experimental ethnography online. Cultural Studies, 28(4), 632-642.
Franken, Lina (2020a). Kulturwissenschaftliches digitales Arbeiten. Qualitative Forschung als "digitale Handarbeit"?. Berliner Blätter. Ethnographische und ethnologische Beiträge, 82, 107-118, https://www2.hu-berlin.de/ifeeojs/index.php/blaetter/article/view/1069/16 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Franken, Lina (2020b). Methodologie der Zukunft? Automatisierungspotentiale in kulturwissenschaftlicher Forschung. In Dagmar Hänel, Ove Sutter, Ruth Dorothea Eggel, Fabio Freiberg, Andrea Graf, Victoria Huszka & Kerstin Wolff (Eds.), Planen. Hoffen. Fürchten. Zur Gegenwart der Zukunft im Alltag (pp.217-233). Münster: Waxmann.
Franken, Lina (2022a). Erweiterungen der Digital Humanities durch kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. In Michaela Geierhos (Ed.), Konferenzabstracts. 8th conference Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (DHd 2022) "Kulturen des digitalen Gedächtnisses", Potsdam/digital, Germany, March 7-11 (pp.101-104), https://zenodo.org/record/6327985 [Accessed: May 02, 2022].
Franken, Lina (2022b). Invisible patients? Patients' agency within the discourse on telemedicine. Curare. Zeitschrift für Medizinethnologie, 45(2), 101-113.
Franken, Lina; Koch, Gertraud & Zinsmeister, Heike (2020). Annotationen als Instrument der Strukturierung. In Julia Nantke & Frederik Schlupkothen (Eds.), Annotation in scholarly editions and research (pp.89-108). Berlin: De Gruyter, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110689112-005 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Gaidys, Uta; Gius, Evelyn; Jarchow, Margarete; Koch, Gertraud; Menzel, Wolfgang; Orth, Dominik & Zinsmeister, Heike (2017). Project descripition—hermA: Automated modelling of hermeneutic processes. Hamburger Journal für Kulturanthropologie, 7, 119-123, https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/hjk/article/view/1213 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Geertz, Clifford (1999 [1973]). The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Geiger, Jonathan & Pfeiffer, Jasmin (2020). Spielplätze der Theoriebildung in den Digital Humanities. In Christoph Schöch (Ed.), Konferenzabstracts. 7th conference Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (DHd 2020) "Spielräume. Digital Humanities zwischen Modellierung und Interpretation", Universität Paderborn, Germany, March 2-6 (pp.48-51), https://zenodo.org/record/4621980 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Gibbs, Graham R.; Friese, Susanne & Mangabeira, Wilma C. (2002). Technikeinsatz im qualitativen Forschungsprozess. Einführung zu FQS Band 3(2). Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.847 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (2010 [1967]). Grounded Theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Bern: Huber.
Hine, Christine (2015). Ethnography for the internet. Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ignatow, Gabe & Mihalcea, Rada F. (2017). Text mining. A guidebook for the social sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Jacobs, Thomas & Tschötschel, Robin (2019). Topic models meet discourse analysis. A quantitative tool for a qualitative approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(5), 469-485.
Jannidis, Fotis (2017). Grundlagen der Datenmodellierung. In Fotis Jannidis, Hubertus Kohle & Malte Rehbein (Eds.), Digital Humanities. Eine Einführung (pp.99-108). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Jannidis, Fotis; Kohle, Hubertus & Rehbein, Malte (2017a). Warum ein Lehrbuch für Digital Humanities?. In Fotis Jannidis, Hubertus Kohle & Malte Rehbein (Eds.), Digital Humanities. Eine Einführung (pp.XI-XIII). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Jannidis, Fotis; Kohle, Hubertus & Rehbein, Malte (Eds.) (2017b), Digital Humanities. Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Keller, Reiner (2011 [2005]). Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse. Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina E. (2020). Big Social Media Data als epistemologische Herausforderung für die Soziologie. In Sabine Maasen & Jan-Hendrik Passoth (Eds.), Soziologie des Digitalen – Digitale Soziologie? (pp.109-133). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Kitchin, Rob (2014a). The data revolution. Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Kitchin, Rob (2014b). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951714528481 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Kitchin, Rob & Lauriault, Tracey P. (2018). Toward critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. In Jim Thatcher, Andrew Shears & Josef Eckert (Eds.), Thinking big data in geography. New regimes, new research (pp.3-20). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Koch, Gertraud & Franken, Lina (2020). Filtern als digitales Verfahren in der wissenssoziologischen Diskursanalyse. Potentiale und Herausforderungen der Automatisierung im Kontext der Grounded Theory. In Samuel Breidenbach, Peter Klimczak & Christer Petersen (Eds.), Soziale Medien. Interdisziplinäre Zugänge zur Onlinekommunikation (pp.121-138). Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.
Klug, Helmut W. (Ed.) (2021). KONDE Weißbuch. Kompetenznetzwerk Digitale Edition, https://www.digitale-edition.at/ [Accessed: March 13, 2022].
Knox, Hannah & Nafus, Dawn (Ed.) (2018). Ethnography for a data-saturated world. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kropf, Jonathan (2019). Recommender Systems in der populären Musik. Kritik und Gestaltungsoptionen. In Jonathan Kropf & Stefan Laser (Eds.), Digitale Bewertungspraktiken. Für eine Bewertungssoziologie des Digitalen (pp.127-163). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Legewie, Nicolas & Nassauer, Anne (2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st century online video research and research ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), Art. 32, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3130 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Leimgruber, Walter (2013). Entgrenzungen. Kultur – empirisch. In Reinhard Johler, Christian Marchetti, Bernhard Tschofen & Carmen Weith (Eds.), Kultur_Kultur. Denken. Forschen. Darstellen (pp.71-85). Münster: Waxmann.
Lemke, Matthias & Wiedemann, Gregor (Eds.) (2016). Text Mining in den Sozialwissenschaften. Grundlagen und Anwendungen zwischen qualitativer und quantitativer Diskursanalyse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Lewis, Lori (2020). Infographic: What happens in an internet minute 2020. AllAccess.com, March 10, https://www.allaccess.com/merge/archive/31294/infographic-what-happens-in-an-internet-minute [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Light, Ben; Burgess, Jean & Duguay, Stefanie (2017). The walkthrough method. An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900.
Lindner, Rolf (2003). Vom Wesen der Kulturanalyse. Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 99, 177-188.
Liu, Bing (2015). Sentiment analysis. Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupton, Deborah (2015). Digital sociology. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
MacMillan, Katie (2005). More than just coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a discourse analysis of news texts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 25, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.28 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Manovich, Lev (2020). Cultural analytics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marcus, George E. (2009). Introduction. Notes toward an ethnographic memoir of supervising graduate research through anthropology's decades of transformation. In James D. Faubion & George E. Marcus (Eds.), Fieldwork is not what it used to be. Learning anthropology's method in a time of transition (pp.1-34). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Marres, Noortje (2017). Digital sociology. The reinvention of social research. Cambridge: Polity.
Mau, Steffen (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor & Cukier, Kenneth (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: Muray.
McCallum, Andrew Kachites (2002). MALLET. A machine learning for language toolkit, http://mallet.cs.umass.edu/ [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
McCarty, Willard (2004). Modeling. A study in words and meanings. In Susan Schreibman, John Unsworth & Raymond George Siemens (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp.254-270). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
McCarty, Willard (2005). Humanities computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morse, Janice M. & Niehaus, Linda (2016). Mixed method design. Principles and procedures. London: Taylor and Francis.
Mosconi, Gaia; Li, Qinyu; Randall, Dave; Karasti, Helena; Tolmie, Peter; Barutzky, Jana; Korn, Matthias & Pipek, Volkmar (2019). Three gaps in opening science. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(3-4), 749-789.
Muri, Gabriela (2014). Triangulationsverfahren im Forschungsprozess. In Christine Bischoff, Karoline Oehme-Jüngling & Walter Leimgruber (Eds.), Methoden der Kulturanthropologie (pp.459-473). Bern: UTB.
Nelson, Laura K. (2020). Computational grounded theory. A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49, 3-42, https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Paulus, Trena M.; Jackson, Kristi & Davidson, Judith (2017). Digital tools for qualitative research: Disruptions and entanglements. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(10), 751-756.
Peetz, Thorsten (2021). Digitalisierte intime Bewertung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 73, 425-450.
Pink, Sarah; Ruckenstein, Minna; Willim, Robert & Duque, Melisa (2018). Broken data. Conceptualising data in an emerging world. Big Data & Society, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717753228 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Pink, Sarah; Horst, Heather A.; Postill, John; Hjorth, Larissa; Lewis, Tania & Tacchi, Jo (2016). Digital ethnography. Principles and practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Pustejovsky, James & Stubbs, Amber (2012). Natural language annotation for machine learning. Beijing: O'Reilly.
Reckwitz, Andreas (2004). Die Kontingenzperspektive der "Kultur". Kulturbegriffe, Kulturtheorien und das kulturwissenschaftliche Forschungsprogramm. In Friedrich Jaeger & Jörn Rüsen (Eds.), Handbuch der Kulturwissenschaften. Vol. 3: Themen und Tendenzen (pp.1-20). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Reckwitz, Andreas (2008). Praktiken und Diskurse. Eine sozialtheoretische und methodologische Relation. In Herbert Kalthoff, Stefan Hirschauer & Gesa Lindemann (Eds.), Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung (2nd ed., pp.188-209). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Rehbein, Malte (2017). Informationsvisualisierung. In Fotis Jannidis, Hubertus Kohle & Malte Rehbein (Eds.), Digital Humanities. Eine Einführung (pp.328-342). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Reichert, Ramón & Richterich, Annika (2015). Introduction. Digital materialism. Digital Culture & Society, 1, 5-17, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/634 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Reichertz, Jo (2013). Die Abduktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Über die Entdeckung des Neuen (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Rieker, Peter; Hartmann Schaelli, Giovanna & Jakob, Silke (2020). Zugang ist nicht gleich Zugang. Verläufe, Bedingungen und Ebenen des Feldzugangs in ethnografischen Forschungen. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(2), Art. 19, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.2.3353 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Rogers, Richard (2019). Doing digital methods. London: Sage.
Ruppert, Evelyn; Law, John & Savage, Mike (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22-46.
Sahle, Patrick (2015). Digital Humanities? Gibt's doch gar nicht!. Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften, http://dx.doi.org/10.17175/sb001_004 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Sahle, Patrick (2019). Professuren für Digital Humanities, https://dhd-blog.org/?p=11018 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Salganik, Matthew J. (2018). Bit by bit. Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schreibman, Susan; Unsworth, John & Siemens, Raymond George (Eds.) (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sismondo, Sergio (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith, Rachel Charlotte (2013). Designing heritage for a digital culture. In Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto & Rachel Charlotte Smith (Eds.), Design anthropology. Theory and practice (pp.177-138). London: Bloomsbury.
Snee, Helene; Hine, Christine; Morey, Yvette; Roberts, Steven & Watson, Hayley (Eds.) (2016). Digital methods for social science. An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stiemer, Haimo & Vauth, Michael (2020). "Mit den Himbeeren stimmte etwas nicht". Die Ernährung in der dystopischen Gegenwartsliteratur. In Jennifer Grünewald & Anja Trittelvitz (Eds.), Ernährung und Identität (pp.203-222). Stuttgart: ibidem.
Strübing, Jörg (2019). Grounded Theory und Theoretical Sampling. In Nina Baur & Jörg Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp.525-544). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Strübing, Jörg; Hirschauer, Stefan; Ayaß, Ruth; Krähnke, Uwe & Scheffer, Thomas (2018). Gütekriterien qualitativer Sozialforschung. Ein Diskussionsanstoß. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47(2), 83-100.
Svensson, Patrik (2016). Big digital humanities. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Thaller, Manfred (2017). Digital Humanities als Wissenschaft. In Fotis Jannidis, Hubertus Kohle & Malte Rehbein (Eds.), Digital Humanities. Eine Einführung (pp.13-18). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Trier, Jost (1973 [1931]). Über Wort- und Begriffsfelder. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Turner, Victor (2005 [1969]). Das Ritual. Struktur und Anti-Struktur. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
Universität Klagenfurt (2021). Humanwissenschaft des Digitalen, https://www.aau.at/digital-age-research-center/humanwissenschaft-des-digitalen/ [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Unsworth, John (2000). Scholarly primitives. What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this. Presentation, Symposium Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice, King's College, London, UK, May 13, https://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
van Gennep, Arnold (1999 [1909]). Übergangsriten. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
Wiechmann, Brigitte (2012). Die Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND). Rückblick und Ausblick. Dialog mit Bibliotheken, 24(2), 20-22, https://d-nb.info/1038598885/34 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Wiedemann, Gregor; Remus, Steffen; Chawla, Avi & Biemann, Chris (2019). Does BERT make any sense? Interpretable word sense disambiguation with contextualized embeddings. In German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp.161-170), https://corpora.linguistik.uni-erlangen.de/data/konvens/proceedings/papers/KONVENS2019_paper_43.pdf [Accessed: April 28, 2022].
Witt, Harald (2001). Forschungsstrategien bei quantitativer und qualitativer Sozialforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 8, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.969 [Accessed: October 25, 2021].
Woletz, Julie (2016). Human-Computer Interaction. Kulturanthropologische Perspektiven auf Interfaces. Darmstadt: Büchner.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Lina Franken
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
