Review: Janet Heaton (2004). Reworking Qualitative Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.40Keywords:
secondary analysis, qualitative analysis, qualitative analysis as methodologyAbstract
For more than a quarter of a century, researchers have systematically analyzed quantitative data from secondary data sets. Many of these data sets are widely available and researchers are encouraged to explore new questions. This widely accepted practice is being expanded to include qualitative data sets and, in this book, HEATON provides a fairly extensive review of such efforts, especially in the United Kingdom. She identifies some sixty-five studies and uses them to explore issues about procedures, ethics and epistemology. Further, she puts forth the idea that conducting qualitative secondary analyses might become a new methodology. One interesting idea she presents is that there are different characteristics of secondary analyses, varying by function, focus, type of data and source of data. Just over 100 pages, this book will provide you with some new insights into the practice of secondary analysis. I was left, however, with wanting more than HEATON provided. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503150Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2005-09-30
How to Cite
Lichtman, M. (2005). Review: Janet Heaton (2004). Reworking Qualitative Data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.40
Issue
Section
FQS Reviews
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Marilyn Lichtman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.