Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of "Communicative Constructivism"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4064Keywords:
communicative constructivism, constructionism, ethnography, ethnomethodology, focused ethnography, (symbolic) interactionism, videographyAbstract
In this article, we offer some observations on the international standing of communicative constructivism (CoCo), as discussed in scholarship published largely in German over the past decade (e.g., KELLER, KNOBLAUCH & REICHERTZ, 2013; KNOBLAUCH, 2019a [2016]; REICHERTZ, 2009). We seek to explain why, in our view, CoCo has not thus far had a noticeable influence on academic discourse in international, particularly Anglo-American, sociology. Amongst others, we highlight issues regarding the name that was picked for the perspective and regarding the literal translation of German CoCo terminology into the English language. We also point to some theoretical and methodological choices that have made it difficult to link CoCo to interactionist sociology in general, and to ethnomethodology and ethnography in particular, i.e., perspectives that we are closely aligned with. We conclude with a summary of our observations and a few suggested steps communicative constructivists might consider taking to broaden and diversify the appeal of their program beyond German speaking sociology.
Downloads
References
Åkerström, Malin; Jacobsson, Katarina; Cederholm, Erika A. & Wästerfors, David (2021). Hidden attractions of administration: The peculiar appeal of meetings and documents. London: Routledge.
Atkinson, Paul & Housley, William (2003). Interactionism. London: Sage.
Berger, Peter L. (2011). Adventures of an accidental sociologist: How to explain the world without becoming a bore. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas (1991 [1966]). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.
Bergmann, Jörg; Meyer, Christian; Salomon, René & Krämer, Hannes (2019). Garfinkel folgen, heißt, die Soziologie vom Kopf auf die Füße zu stellen. Jörg Bergmann & Christian Meyer im Gespräch mit René Salomon & Hannes Krämer. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.2.3289 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P. & Pinch, Trevor (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, https://monoskop.org/images/1/1f/Bijker_Hughes_Pinch_eds_The_Social_Construction_of_Technological_Systems._New_Directions_in_the_Sociology_and_History_of_Technology_no_OCR.pdf [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Breidenstein, Georg & Hirschauer, Stefan (2001). Endlich fokussiert? Weder "Ethno" noch "Graphie". Sozialer Sinn, 2(1), 125-128.
Brekhus, Wayne H.; DeGloma, Thomas & Force, William Ryan (Eds.) (2022). Oxford handbook of symbolic interactionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Christmann, Gabriela B. (2015). Zur kommunikativen Konstruktion von Räumen: Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Analysen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Christmann, Gabriela B.; Knoblauch, Hubert & Löw, Martina (Eds.) (2022). Communicative constructions and the refiguration of spaces: Theoretical approaches and empirical studies. London: Routledge.
Coates, Lilian (2022). "The temporal 'succession' of here and now situations": Schütz and Garfinkel on sequentiality in interaction. Human Studies, 45, 469-491, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09632-8 [Accessed: August 30, 2023].
Coffey, Amanda (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage.
Couch, Carl J. (1996). Information technologies and social orders. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Couldry, Nick & Hepp, Andreas (Eds.) (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3).
Croissant, Jennifer L. (2014). PowerPoint, communication, and the knowledge society. Contemporary Sociology, 43(3), 383-385.
Cruz, Edward V. & Higginbottom, Gina (2013). The use of focus research ethnography in nursing. Nurse Researcher, 20, 36-43.
Dean, Jodi (2014). Communicative capitalism and class struggle. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures, 1, 1-16, https://spheres-journal.org/contribution/communicative-capitalism-and-class-struggle/ [Accessed: August 30, 2023].
Dingwall, Robert; DeGloma, Thomas & Newmahr, Staci (2012). Editors' introduction: Symbolic interaction—Serving the whole interactionist family. Symbolic Interaction, 35(1), 1-5.
Eberle, Thomas S. (2019). Variations of constructivism. In Michaela Pfadenhauer & Hubert Knoblauch (Eds.), Social constructivism as paradigm? The legacy of the social construction of reality (pp.131-151). London: Routledge.
Emerson, Robert M. (2001). Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Emerson, Robert M.; Fretz, Rachel I. & Shaw, Linda L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fine, Gary Alan (Ed.) (1995). A second Chicago School? The development of a postwar American sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, Harold (1962). Notes on the sociological attitude. Unpublished manuscript, property of A. Rawls and the Garfinkel Archive, No. 456, Newbury, MA, USA.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, Harold (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Garfinkel, Harold (2006 [1948]). Seeing sociologically. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, Harold & Wieder, D. Lawrence (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Graham Watson & Robert M. Seiler (Eds.) Text in context, contributions to ethnomethodology (pp.175-206). London: Sage.
Gergen, Kenneth J. & Gergen, Mary (2009 [2004]). Einführung in den sozialen Konstruktionismus.. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag.
Gibson, Will (2022). All you need is guitar pedals: The communicative construction of material culture in YouTube product reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 49, Art. 100626.
Gibson, Will; Huang, Pingping & Yu, Qianyun (2018). Emoji and communicative action: The semiotics, sequence and gestural actions of "face covering hand". Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 91-99.
Giddens, Anthony (1998). The third way. The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Glesne, Corine (2015). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York, NY: Pearson.
Goodwin, Charles (2000). Pointing as situated practice. In Sotaro Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp.217-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goodwin, Charles & Salomon, René (2019). Not being bound by what you can see now. Charles Goodwin in conversation with René Salomon. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.2.3271 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Günthner, Susanne & Knoblauch, Hubert (1995). Culturally patterned speaking practices—The analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics, 5(1), 1-32.
Gurwitsch, Aron (2010). The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973): Volume III: The field of consciousness: Theme, thematic field, and margin (ed. by R.M. Zaner). New York, NY: Springer.
Habermas, Jürgen (1985 [1981]). The theory of communicative action (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Hacking, Ian (2000). The social construction of what?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harris, Scott R. (2008). Constructionism in sociology. In James A. Holstein & Jaber F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp.231-247). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Harris, Scott R. (2010). What is constructionism?: Navigating its use in sociology. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Heath, Christian & Luff, Paul (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian; Hindmarsh, Jon & Luff, Paul (2010). Video in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heath, Christian; Knoblauch, Hubert & Luff, Paul (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of "workplace studies''. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299-320.
Held, Barbara S. (1995). The real meaning of constructivism. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8(4), 305-315.
Hepp, Andreas & Couldry, Nick (2023). Necessary entanglements: Reflections on the role of a "materialist phenomenology" in researching deep mediatization and datafication. Sociologica, 17(1), 137-153, https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/15793 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Herbrik, Regine (2011). Die kommunikative Konstruktion imaginärer Welten. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Hindmarsh, Jon & Heath, Christian (2000a). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523-565.
Hindmarsh, Jon & Heath, Christian (2000b). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855-1878.
Hollstein, Betina; Greshoff, Rainer; Schimank, Uwe & Weiß, Anja (2020). A companion to German-language sociology. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Holstein, James A. & Gubrium, Jaber F. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Housley, William (2021). Society in the digital age: An interactionist perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hughes, John; King, Val; Rodden, Tom & Andersen, Hans (1995). The role of ethnography in interactive systems design. Interactions, 2(2), 56-65.
Katz, Jack & Csordas, Thomas J. (2003). Phenomenological ethnography in sociology and anthropology. Ethnography, 4(3), 275-288.
Keller, Reiner (2009 [1998]). Müll – Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion des Wertvollen: Die öffentliche Diskussion über Abfall in Deutschland und Frankreich. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Keller, Reiner (2013). Kommunikative Konstruktion und Diskursive Konstruktion. In Reiner Keller, Hubert Knoblauch & Jo Reichertz (Eds.), Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus. Theoretische und Empirische Arbeiten Zu einem Neuen Wissenssoziologischen Ansatz (pp.69-94). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Keller, Reiner (2018). The discursive construction of realities. In Michaela Pfadenhauer & Hubert Knoblauch (Eds.), Social constructivism as paradigm? (pp.310-324). London: Routledge.
Keller, Reiner (2019). New materialism? A view from sociology of knowledge. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann & Joost Van Loon (Eds.), Discussing new materialism. Methodological implications for the study of materialities (pp.151-169). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Keller, Reiner; Hornidge, Anna-Katharina & Schünemann, Wolf (Eds.) (2018). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse: Investigating the politics of knowledge and meaning-making. London : Routledge.
Keller, Reiner; Knoblauch, Hubert & Reichertz, Jo (Eds.) (2013). Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus: Theoretische und empirische Arbeiten zu einem neuen wissenssoziologischen Ansatz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah & van Loon, Joost (Eds.) (2019). Discussing new materialism. Methodological implications for the study of materialities. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2001). Fokussierte Ethnographie. Sozialer Sinn, 1(1), 143-142.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2002). Fokussierte Ethnographie als Teil einer soziologischen Ethnographie. Zur Klärung einiger Missverständnisse. Sozialer Sinn, 2(1), 129-135, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-6930 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert (2004). Die Video-Interaktions-Analyse. Sozialer Sinn, 5(1), 123-138, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-7571 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 44, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20 [Accessed: September 14, 2023]
Knoblauch, Hubert (2007). Die Performanz des Wissens: Zeigen und Wissen in Powerpoint-Präsentationen. In Hubert Knoblauch & Bernt Schnettler (Eds.), Powerpoint-Präsentationen. Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen (S.117-138). Konstanz: UVK. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-6872 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert (2010). Wissenssoziologie. Tübingen: UTB.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2011). Videoanalyse, Videointeraktionsanalyse und Videographie – zur Klärung einiger Missverständnisse. Sozialer Sinn, 12(1), 139-146.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2012a). PowerPoint, communication, and the knowledge society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2012b). Focused ethnography and video analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods—Qualitative and audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp.69-84). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang
Knoblauch, Hubert (2013). Communicative constructivism and mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 297-315.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2016). Die Kommunikative Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt/M.: Springer VS.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2019a [2016]). The communicative construction of reality. London: Routledge.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2019b). The communicative turn in German sociology of knowledge. Society Register, 3(1), 23-38, https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.1.02 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert (2020). From the social to the communicative construction of reality. In Michaela Pfadenhauer & Hubert Knoblauch (Eds.), Social constructivism as paradigm? The legacy of the social construction of reality (pp.275-291. London: Routledge.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2022). Towards a social theory of sequentiality. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur Verbalen Interaktion, 23, 89-110, http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2022/si-knoblauch.pdf [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert & Heath, Christian (1999). Technologie, Interaktion und Organisation: Die workplace studies. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25(2), 163-181, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-8392 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Knoblauch, Hubert & Schnettler, Bernt (2012). Videography: Analysing video data as a "focused ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise". Qualitative Research, 12(3), 334-356.
Knoblauch, Hubert & Schnettler, Bernt (2015). Video and vision: Videography of a Marian apparition. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(5), 636-656.
Knoblauch, Hubert & Steets, Silke (2020). Die Objektivation der Sprache. Von der alten zur neuen Soziologie der Sprache. In Birgit Blättel-Mink (Eds.) Gesellschaft unter Spannung. Verhandlungen des 40. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2020 (pp.1-10). Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie.
Knoblauch, Hubert & Tuma, René (2011). Videography: An interpretative approach to video-recorded micro-social interaction. In Eric Margolis & Luc Pawels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp.414-429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Knoblauch, Hubert & Vollmer, Theresa (2022). Ethnographie. In Nina Baur & Jörg Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp.659-676). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Knoblauch, Hubert & Wilke, René (2016). The common denominator: The reception and impact of Berger and Luckmann's "The social construction of reality". Human Studies, 39(1), 51-69.
Knoblauch, Hubert; Tuma, René & Schnettler, Bernt (Eds.) (2014). Videography: Introduction to interpretive videoanalysis of social situations. Frankfurt//M: Peter Lang.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kusenbach, Margarethe (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 449-479.
Kusenbach, Margarethe & Brown-Saracino, Japonica (2021). Urban ethnography. In Anthony M. Orum, Javier Ruiz-Tagle & Serena V. Haddock (Eds.), Companion to urban and regional studies (pp.282-310). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Kusenbach, Margarethe & Christmann, Gabriela (2021). Disasters. In Wayne Brekhus, Thomas DeGloma & William Force (Eds.), Oxford handbook of symbolic interaction (pp.529-548). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawson, Tony; Collier, Andrew; Bhaskar, Roy; Archer, Margaret & Norrie, Andrew (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. London: Routledge
Llewellyn, Nick & Hindmarsh, Jon (2010). Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loehnhoff, Jens (2018). Objectification and verbalization: Social constructivism and the problem of language. In Michaela Pfadenhauer & Hubert Knoblauch (Eds.), Social constructivism as paradigm?: The legacy of the social construction of reality (pp.105-117). London: Routledge.
Loseke, Donileen R. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integration. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(4), 661-688.
Loseke, Donileen R. (2021). Narrative as topic and method in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Loseke, Donileen R. & Kusenbach, Margarethe (2008). The social construction of emotion. In James A. Holstein & Jaber F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp.511-529). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Low, Setha (2016). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. New York, NY: Routledge.
Luff, Paul; Hindmarsh, Jon & Heath, Christian (Eds.) (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maines, David (Ed.) (2001). The faultline of consciousness: A view of interactionism in sociology. New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.
Maso, Ilja (2001). Phenomenology and ethnography. In Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland & Lyn Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp.136-144). London: Sage.
McNamee, Sheila (2018). Far from "anything goes": Ethics as communally constructed. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31(4), 361-368.
Mead, George Herbert (1967 [1934]). Mind, self, and society from the perspective of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, George Herbert (2002 [1938]). The philosophy of the present. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Meier zu Verl, Christian & Tuma, René (2021). Video analysis and ethnographic knowledge: An empirical study of video analysis practice. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 120-144.
Miller, Gale & Holstein, James A. (2017). Constructionist controversies: Issues in social problems theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mondada, Lorenza (2019). Rethinking bodies and objects in social interaction: A multimodal and multisensorial approach to tasting. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann & Joost Van Loon (Eds.), Discussing new materialism. Methodological implications for the study of materialities (pp.109-134). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Morriss, Lisa (2019). Unique adequacy. In Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug & Richard A. Williams (Eds.), Sage research methods foundations (online). London: Sage.
Pfadenhauer, Michaela & Knoblauch, Hubert (Eds.) (2019). Social constructivism as paradigm?: The legacy of the social construction of reality. London: Routledge.
Pink, Sarah & Morgan, Jennie (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351-361.
Pink, Sarah; Morgan, Jennie & Dainty, Andrew (2014). The safe hand: Gels, water, gloves and the materiality of tactile knowing. Journal of Material Culture, 19(4), 425-442.
Plummer, Ken (2021). Critical humanism: A manifesto for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Puddephatt, Tony (2006). An interview with Kathy Charmaz: On constructing grounded theory. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(3), 5-20.
Rawls, Anne W. (2006). Respecifying the study of social order: Garfinkel's transition from theoretical conceptualization to practice in details. In Harold Garfinkel, Seeing sociologically (pp.1-98). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Reckwitz, Andreas (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
Reichertz, Jo (2009). Kommunikationsmacht: Was ist Kommunikation und was vermag sie? Und weshalb vermag sie das? Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Reichertz, Jo (2013). Grundzüge des kommunikativen Konstruktivismus. In Reiner Keller, Jo Reichertz, & Hubert Knoblauch (Eds.), Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus (pp.49-68). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Reichertz, Jo & Bettmann, Richard (2018). Kommunikation – Medien – Konstruktion: Braucht die Mediatisierungsforschung den kommunikativen Konstruktivismus?- Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Reichertz, Jo & Tuma, René (Eds.) (2017). Der kommunikative Konstruktivismus der Arbeit. Weinheim: Belz.
Reichertz, Jo & Zielke, Barbara (2008). Editorial: Theories that matter. On some pragmatic aspects of social constructionism. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.1.346 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Reynolds, Larry T. & Herman-Kinney, Nancy J. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Rooke, Clementinah N. & Rooke, John A. (2015). An introduction to unique adequacy. Nurse Researcher, 22(6), 35-39.
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. (2 vols.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 4(1), 696-735.
Schatzki, Theodore R.; Knorr-Cetina, Karin & von Savigny, Eike (Eds.) (2000). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schmidt, Robert (2012). Soziologie der Praktiken: Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Schmidt, Robert (2019). Materiality, meaning, social practices: Remarks on new materialism. In Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann & Joost Van Loon (Eds.), Discussing new materialism. Methodological implications for the study of materialities (pp.35-150). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Schütz, Alfred (1967). Collected papers I. The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schütz, Alfred & Luckmann, Thomas (1985). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schwarze, Cordula (2014). Die Methode "Datensitzung" und ihre Nutzbarmachung für die Erforschung von Theatergestik: "Ich sehe was, was du nicht siehst ... oder doch". In Cordula Schwarze & Carmen Konzett (Eds.), Interaktionsforschung: Gesprächsanalytische Fallstudien und Forschungspraxis (pp.177-208). Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Smith, Dorothy E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Smith, Dorothy E. (Ed.) (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smith, Dorothy E. & Turner, Susan Marie (2014). Incorporating texts into institutional ethnographies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Soeffner, Hans-Georg (2019). Easy Rider. In Schnettler, Bernt, René Tuma, Dirk vom Lehn, Boris Traue & Thomas S. Eberle (Eds.), Kleines Al(e)phabet des Kommunikativen Konstruktivismus: Fundus Omnium Communicativum – Hubert Knoblauch zum 60. Geburtstag (pp.95-100). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Suchman, Lucy; Gerst, Dominik & Krämer, Hannes (2019). "If you want to understand the big issues, you need to understand the everyday practices that constitute them." Lucy Suchman in conversation with Dominik Gerst & Hannes Krämer. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.2.3252 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Taylor, Simon P. (2018). Critical realism vs. social constructionism & social constructivism: Application to a social housing research study. International Journal of Sciences, 37(2), 216-222.
Tierney, Kathleen (2019). Disasters: A sociological approach. Oxford: Wiley.
Tuma, René (2016). Videoprofis im Alltag: Die kommunikative Vielfalt der Videoanalyse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Tuma, René (2021). Video in interactionist research. In Dirk vom Lehn, Natalia Ruiz-Junco & Will Gibson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of interactionism (pp.369-380). New York, NY: Routledge.
vom Lehn, Dirk (2014a). Timing Is money: Managing the floor in sales interaction at street-market stalls. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13-14), 1448-1466.
vom Lehn, Dirk (2014b). Harold Garfinkel: The creation and development of ethnomethodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
vom Lehn, Dirk (2018). Ethnomethodologische Interaktionsanalyse: Videodaten analysieren und die Organisation von Handlungen darstellen. Weinheim: Belz Juventa.
vom Lehn, Dirk (2019). From Garfinkel's "experiments in miniature" to the ethnomethodological analysis of interaction. Human Studies, 42(2), 305-326.
vom Lehn, Dirk; Heath, Christian & Knoblauch, Hubert (2001). Configuring exhibits: The interactional production of experience in museums and galleries. In Hubert Knoblauch & Helga Kotthoff (Eds.), Verbal art across cultures: The aesthetics and proto-aesthetics of communication (pp.281-297). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
vom Lehn, Dirk; Ruiz-Junco, Natalia & GIBSON, Will (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge international handbook of interactionism. London: Routledge.
vom Lehn, Dirk; Gibson, Will & Ruiz-Junco, Natalia (Eds.) (2024). People, technology, and social organization. London: Routledge.
Welzer, Harald; Soeffner, Hans-Georg & Giesecke, Dana (2022). Climate culture. In Thorsten Heimann, Jamie Sommer, Margarethe Kusenbach, & Gabriela Christmann (Eds.), Climate cultures in Europe and North America: New formations of environmental knowledge and action (pp.17-24). London: Routledge.
Wolff, Stephan & Salomon, René (2019). "Wenn Ihnen der liebe Gott zwei Zehntelsekunden oder das 'Mhm' schenken würde, dann könnten Sie die Welt verändern." Stephan Wolff im Gespräch mit René Salomon. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.2.3285 [Accessed: September 14, 2023].
Zielke, Barbara (2004). Kognition und soziale Praxis: Der soziale Konstruktionismus und die Perspektiven einer postkognitivistischen Psychologie. Bielefeld: transcript.
Zielke, Barbara & Gergen, Kenneth (2007). Sozialer Konstruktionismus: Psychologische Diskurse. Göttingen: Brill Deutschland.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dirk vom Lehn, Magarethe Kusenbach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
