Historical Ethnography: Key Characteristics and the Journey Before, During, and After the Archival Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.2.4106Keywords:
historical ethnography, archives, video-indexing, temporal codes, abductive methodology, deductive category applicationAbstract
The aim of this article is to elaborate on the overlooked strategy of historical ethnography. Drawing from the literature and sharing vignettes from my research at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees archive, I advance in two stages. First, by reviewing key works, I provide an overview of historical ethnography, focusing mainly on its distinct characteristics: The historical reach and reliance on a wide range of materials. I also present the inductive-deductive debate to consider the role of theory. Then I provide informed reflections about the different research stages: Before, during, and after leaving the archival field. Becoming immersed in the subject matter prior to the actual empirical examination opens the path to the archives and to a meaningful data collection endeavor. In turn, informed decisions, rather than luck, fuel the ongoing movement between data collection and analysis. Lastly, acknowledging the interpretive mindset involved with thinking ethnographically, I present indexing and temporal coding as helpful strategies for organizing a large corpus of historical data.
Downloads
References
Abbott, Andrew (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Aminzade, Ronald (1992). Historical sociology and time. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(4), 456-480.
Atkinson, Paul (2017). Thinking ethnographically. London: Sage.
Ben-Yehuda, Nachman (2009). The history, myth, and science of Masada: The making of an historical ethnography. In Antony J. Puddephatt, William Shaffir & Steven W. Kleinknecht (Eds.), Ethnographies revisited: Constructing theory in the field (pp.331-345). London: Routledge.
Benzecry, Claudio E.; Deener, Andrew & Lara-Millán, Armando (2020). Archival work as qualitative sociology. Qualitative Sociology, 43(3), 297-303.
Bhimull, Chandra; Cohen, David; Coronil, Fernando; Murphy, Edward; Patterson, Monica & Skurski, Julie (Eds.) (2011). Anthrohistory: Unsettling knowledge, questioning discipline. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Burawoy, Michael (2009). The extended case method: Four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Burawoy, Michael (2017). On Desmond: The limits of spontaneous sociology. Theory and Society, 46(4), 261-284.
Campbell, Elizabeth & Lassiter, Luke Eric (2015). Doing ethnography today: Theories, methods, exercises. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Carr, Deborah; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger; Cornwell, Benjamin; Correll, Shelley; Crosnoe, Robert; Freese, Jeremy & Waters, Mary C. (2018). The art and science of social research. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Cohen, Marilyn (2001). Toward an historical anthropology of the "ethical state": Articulations among gender, class and education in an Irish parish, 1860-1910. Irish Journal of Sociology, 10(2), 13-32.
Comaroff, John L. & Comaroff, Jean (1992). Ethnography and the historical imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Dalbello, Marija & McGowan, Catherine (2020). Memory narrations as a source for historical ethnography and the sensorial-affective experience of migration. In Tuuli Lähdesmäki, Eerika Koskinen-Koivisto, Viktorija L.A. Čeginskas & Aino-Kaisa Koistinen (Eds.), Challenges and solutions in ethnographic research: Ethnography with a twist (pp.161-184). London: Routledge.
Deterding, Nicole M. & Waters, Mary C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708-739.
Fine, Gary Alan & Deegan, James G. (1996). Three principles of serendip: Insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 434-447.
Glaeser, Andreas (2011). Political epistemics: The secret police, the opposition, and the end of East German socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Glaser, Barney & Strauss, Anselm (2006 [1967]). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
Goffman, Erving (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Gracy, Karen F. (2004). Documenting communities of practice: Making the case for archival ethnography. Archival Science, 4(3-4), 335-365.
Grant, Aimee (2018). Doing excellent social research with documents: Practical examples and guidance for qualitative researchers. Abingdon: Routledge.
Grossman, Jonathan; Amano, Orel B. & Pedahzur, Ami (2022). Managing high-volume digital sources in political research with emerging technologies. SSRN Scholarly Paper, ID 4012684, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4012684 [Accessed: September 2, 2022].
Hammersley, Martyn & Atkinson, Paul (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
Hill, Michael R. (1993). Archival strategies and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hsiung, Ping-Chun (2017). The politics of rebuilding Chinese sociology in 1980s. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 89-101.
Hunter, Marcus Anthony (2013). Black citymakers: How the Philadelphia negro changed urban America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kalberg, Stephen (1994). Max Weber's comparative-historical sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kinney, Alexander B. & Rowland, Nicholas J. (2021). Making the grade during pandemic: Early-stage and late-stage provisional institutions. Sociological Perspectives, 64(5), 1012-1031.
May, Tim (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Merry, Sally Engle (2002). Ethnography in the archives. In June Starr & Mark Goodale (Eds.), Practicing ethnography in law: New dialogues, enduring methods (pp.128-142). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moeran, Brian (2009). From participant observation to observant participation. In Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow, Henry Welsh & Frans Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp.139-155). London: Sage.
Moore, Niamh; Salter, Andrea; Stanley, Liz & Tamboukou, Maria (2017). The archive project: Archival research in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Mutongi, Kenda (2007). Worries of the heart: Widows, family, and community in Kenya. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Næss, Hans Erik (2016). Creating "the field": Glocality, relationality and transformativity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(3), Art. 15, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2600 [Accessed: June 20, 2023].
Nkwi, Walter Gam (2015). African modernities and mobilities: An historical ethnography of Kom, Cameroon, c. 1800-2008. Bamenda: Langaa Research & Publishing CIG.
O'Reilly, Karen (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. London: Sage.
Punathil, Salah (2021). Archival ethnography and ethnography of archiving: Towards an anthropology of riot inquiry commission reports in postcolonial India. History and Anthropology, 32(3), 312-330.
Riles, Annelise (Ed.) (2006). Documents: Artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Rogers, Douglas (2009). The old faith and the Russian land: A historical ethnography of ethics in the Urals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rotem, Nir (2022). World society and field theory: The infiltration of development into humanitarianism. The British Journal of Sociology, 73(2), 402-420.
Samimian-Darash, Limor & Rotem, Nir (2019). From crisis to emergency: The shifting logic of preparedness. Ethnos, 84(5), 910-926.
Savelsberg, Joachim J. (2015). Representing mass violence: Conflicting responses to human rights violations in Darfur. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Savelsberg, Joachim J. (2021). Knowing about genocide: Armenian suffering and epistemic struggles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Skjott Linneberg, Mai & Korsgaard, Steffen (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270.
Skocpol, Theda (Ed.) (1984). Vision and method in historical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Dorothy E. (1974). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257-268.
Smith, Dorothy E. & Turner, Susan Marie (Eds.) (2014). Incorporating texts into institutional ethnographies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Tamboukou, Maria (2016). Feeling narrative in the archive: The question of serendipity. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 151-166.
Tavory, Iddo & Timmermans, Stefan (2009). Two cases of ethnography: Grounded theory and the extended case method. Ethnography, 10(3), 243-263.
Tavory, Iddo & Timmermans, Stefan (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Timmermans, Stefan & Tavory, Iddo (2022). Data analysis in qualitative research: Theorizing with abductive analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Trace, Ciaran B. (2002). What is recorded is never simply "what happened": Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science, 2(1), 137-159.
van Bemmelen, Sita T. (2017). Christianity, colonization, and gender relations in North Sumatra: A patrilineal society in flux. Leiden: Brill.
Vaughan, Diane (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, Diane (2004). Theorizing disaster: Analogy, historical ethnography, and the Challenger accident. Ethnography, 5(3), 315-347.
Wacquant, Loïc (2003). Ethnografeast: A progress report on the practice and promise of ethnography. Ethnography, 4(1), 5-14.
Weber, Max (1949 [1922]). The methodology of the social sciences (transl. by E. Shils. Glencoe: Free Press.
Woolf, Greg (2011). Tales of the barbarians: Ethnography and empire in the Roman West. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Želinský, Dominik (2019). From deduction to abduction: Constructing a coding frame for communist secret police documents. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Art. 22, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3377 [Accessed: May 15, 2022].
Zerubavel, Eviatar (2021). Generally speaking: An invitation to concept-driven sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nir Rotem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
