Conference Essay: Exploring Spaces of Opportunity for Everyday Creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.1.4159Abstract
In this conference essay, we reflect on a sandpit, organized by the AHRC Everyday Creativity Research Network on the theme of place-making and everyday creativity. We begin by introducing the Everyday Creativity Research Network and the problems faced in defining everyday creativity, which was a key objective of this sandpit. We then discuss the program and major themes identified during the event. We distinguish between the concepts of "space" and "place," with particular consideration into how these concepts shape policies on everyday creativity. "Spaces of opportunity" is proposed in this context as a potential term that offers a framework to understand subjective and collective uses of creativity. We also identify constraints that hinder everyday creativity, including limitations on resources and lack of access. We explore how present models of creative initiatives are restricted by bureaucratic procedures that necessitate a focus on output as a measure of impact. We conclude by reflecting on future actions for this Network to propose alternative models of creative initiatives that encourage everyday creativity in a way that minimizes judgments and barriers while respecting local understandings of creativity.
Downloads
References
Brownett, Tristi & Evans, Owen (2020). Finding common ground: The conception of community arts festivals as spaces for placemaking. Health & Place, 61, Art. 102254.
Burnard, Pamela & Colucci-Gray, Laura (Eds.) (2020). Why sciences and arts creativities matter. (Re-)configuring STEAM for future-making education. Leiden: Brill.
Crossick, Geoffrey & Kaszynska, Patrycja (2016). Understanding the value of arts & culture. The AHRC Cultural Value Project, https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/AHRC-291121-UnderstandingTheValueOfArts-CulturalValueProjectReport.pdf [Accessed: October 18, 2023].
Daykin, Norma; Willis, Jane; McCree, Mel & Gray, Karen (2015). Creative and credible. How to evaluate arts and health projects, https://creativeandcredible.co.uk/ [Accessed: November 7, 2023].
Everyday Creativity Research Network (ECRN) (2023). Welcome to the AHRC Everyday Creativity Research Network, https://blogs.brighton.ac.uk/everydaycreativity/ [Accessed: October 18, 2023].
Faulkner, Sandra L. (2022). Poetic inquiry. Craft, method and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gauntlett, David (2018). Making is connecting: The social power of creativity, from craft and knitting to digital everything (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johnson, Helen (2022a). Embracing the mosaic: Crafting collaborative poetics research for critical resilience. In Kip Jones (Ed.), Doing performative social science (pp.179-194). London: Taylor & Francis.
Johnson, Helen (2022b). Ten incitements to rebellion: Spoken word as a social scientific research tool of, and for, rebellious research. In Pamela. Burnard, Elizabeth. Macklinay, David Rousell & Tatjana Dragovic (Eds.), Doing rebellious research: Performance in and beyond the academy (pp.34-53). Leiden: Brill Sense.
Johnson, Helen (2022c). Beyond disciplines: Spoken word as participatory arts-based research. International Review of Qualitative Research Inquiry, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447211052667 [Accessed: December 16, 2023].
Johnson, Helen & Monney, Nicole (2021). Using the arts to support the arts: A creative, community-university partnership approach to building arts inclusivity in economically-deprived communities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(3), Art. 2, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.3.3650 [Accessed: December 16, 2023].
Johnson, Helen; Carson-Apstein, Emily; Banderob, Simon & Macaulay-Rettino, Xander (2017). "You kind of have to listen to me": Researching discrimination through poetry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), Art. 6, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2864 [Accessed: December 16, 2023].
Jones, Kip; Gergen, Mary; Guiney Yallop, John J.; Lopez de Vallejo, Irene; Roberts, Brian & Wright, Peter (Eds.) (2008). Performative social science. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/10 [Accessed: December 12, 2023].
Mackinlay, Liz (2019). Critical writing for embodied approaches: Autoethnography, feminism and decoloniality. Cham: Palgrave.
Mackinlay, Liz (2022). Writing feminist autoethnography: In love with theory, words and the language of women writers. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mansfield, Louise; Daykin, Norma; Golding, Alex & Ewbank, Nick (2022). Understanding everyday creativity: A framework drawn from a qualitative evidence review of home-based arts. Annals of Leisure Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2022.2089183 [Accessed 16 December 2023].
Massey, Doreen (2005). For space. London: Sage.
Randles, Clint & Burnard, Pamela (2023). The Routledge companion to creativities in music education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laharee Mitra, Helen Johnson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.