Emotions in the Qualitative Research Process: Introduction to the Special Issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4360Keywords:
emotions, qualitative research, reflexivity, interpretative methods, qualitative interviewingAbstract
Emotions play an important role in the qualitative research process. They can both hinder and facilitate scientific inquiry. Scholars rooted in different traditions of qualitative interpretative methods have emphasized the need to reflect on researchers' subjectivity. Thus, we argue that reflexive approaches can offer a starting point for exploring emotions in the qualitative research process. In this article, we introduce the special issue on "Emotions in the Qualitative Research Process." We provide a brief insight into the topic and discuss different theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. By focusing on the qualitative interview methods, we underline the importance of considering emotional reflexivity as a central element of interactive field research.
Downloads
References
Adams, Tony E.; Holman Jones, Stacy & Ellis, Carolyn (2015). Autoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayata, Bilgin; Harders, Cilja; Özkaya, Derya & Wahba, Dina (2019). Interviews as situated affective encounters. A relational and processual approach for empirical research on affect, emotions and politics. In Antje Kahl (Ed.), Analyzing affective societies (pp.63-77). Oxon: Routledge.
Barbalet, Jack (1998). Emotion, social theory and social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Barnwell, Ashley (2025). Listening to interviews: Attending to aurality, emotions, and atmospheres in qualitative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(1), Art. 6, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4345.
Beyer, Manuela (2022). Von der Emotion zum Affekt und wieder zurück? Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Emotionssoziologie. Soziologische Revue, 45(1), 61-76, https://doi.org/10.1515/srsr-2022-0007 [Accessed: January 24, 2025].
Beyer, Manuela & Küster, Anna-Sophia (2022). Zur affektiven Dynamik in Interviews mit Sexarbeitenden. Das qualitative Interview als Bühne der Neuinszenierung einer ressentimentbehafteten Identität. Sozialer Sinn, 23(1), 17-47.
Bonz, Jochen & Eisch-Angus, Katharina (2017). Sinn und Subjektivität. Traditionen und Perspektiven des Methodeninstruments Ethnopsychoanalytische Deutungswerkstatt/Supervisionsgruppe für Feldforscher*innen. In Jochen Bonz, Katharina Eisch-Angus, Marion Hamm & Almut Sülzle (Eds.), Ethnografie und Deutung. Gruppensupervision als Methode reflexiven Forschens (pp.27-58). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brehm, Alina (2021). Repräsentanzen der Shoah. Über ein Café für Überlebende und die Gegenwart der Vergangenheit. Gießen: Psychosozial.
Brehm, Alina & Langer, Phil C. (2025). Is it really (all) about empathy? A strong reflexivity approach to emotionally charged research experiences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(1), Art. 7, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4344.
Breuer, Franz (2024). Was sind sozialwissenschaftliche Daten? Und wozu werden sie gebraucht? Die Nutzung von ForscherInnen-Emotionen im Forschungsprogramm der Reflexiven Grounded Theory. Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik, 48(1), 419-441.
Breuer, Franz; Mruck, Katja & Roth, Wolff-Michael (2002). Subjectivity and reflexivity: An introduction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 9., https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.822 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Breuer, Franz; Muckel, Petra & Dieris, Barbara (2019). Reflexive Grounded Theory. Eine Einführung für die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Brill, Mila & von Stetten, Moritz (2024). Einleitende Anmerkungen: Zur Bedeutung negativer Emotionen in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Sozialer Sinn, 23(1), 1-15.
Davis, Kathy & Irvine, Janice (Eds.) (2022). Silences, neglected feelings, and blind spots in research practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Devereux, Georges (1984 [1967]). Angst und Methode in den Verhaltenswissenschaften. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Flam, Helena (2002). Soziologie der Emotionen: eine Einführung. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
Flam, Helena & Kleres, Jochen (Eds.) (2015). Methods of exploring emotions. London: Routledge.
Gottschalk, Ines & Stamann, Christoph (2023). Der Umgang mit Emotionen in qualitativen Lehrforschungsprojekten. Anlässe, Herausforderungen und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten. Journal für Psychologie, 31(2), 65-85, https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2023-2-65 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Gottschalk, Ines; Krämer, Anike & Tepeli, Dilek (Eds.) (2024a). Forschen und Gefühle I. Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik, 48(1).
Gottschalk, Ines; Krämer, Anike & Tepeli, Dilek (Eds.) (2024b). Forschen und Gefühle II. Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik, 48(2).
Günther, Marga & Kerschgens, Anke (Eds.) (2016). Forschungssituationen (re-)konstruieren. Reflexivität in Forschungen zu intergenerativen Prozessen. Budrich: Opladen.
Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Harding, Sandra (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is "strong objectivity?". In Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp.49-82). London: Routledge.
Hartsock, Nancy C.M. (1983). The feminist standpoint. Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Sandra Harding & Merrill B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp.283-310). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Helfferich, Cornelia (2010). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Soziawissenschaften.
Hilscher, Annette; Rossmeissl, Felix & Siouti, Irini (2020). Einleitung. Kritik zwischen Rekonstruktion und Reflexivität. Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 2(2), 71-80.
Hochschild, Arlie (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Holmes, Mary (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139-154.
Holmes, Mary (2015). Researching emotional reflexivity. Emotion Review, 7(1), 61-66.
Holstein, James A. & Gubrium, Jaber F. (1995). The active interview. New York, NY: Sage.
Illouz, Eva (2006). Gefühle in Zeiten des Kapitalismus. Adorno-Vorlesungen 2004. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Kahl, Antje (Ed.) (2019). Analyzing affective societies. Oxon: Routledge.
Katz, Jack (1999). How emotions work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kasseri, Zacharoula & Tsiolis, Giorgos (2025). "I feel like I'm swallowing stones": Qualitative research in the field of addiction as emotionally challenging work. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(1), Art. 1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4289.
Keller, Rainer (2012). Das Interpretative Paradigma. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kleres, Jochen (2010). Emotions and narrative analysis: A methodological approach. Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2), 182-202.
Kühner, Angela; Ploder, Andrea & Langer, Phil C. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: European contributions to strong reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 699-704.
Langer, Phil C. (2009). Beschädigte Identität. Dynamiken des sexuellen Risikoverhaltens schwuler und bisexueller Männer. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Langer, Phil C. (2016). The research vignette: Reflexive writing as interpretative representation of qualitative inquiry—A methodological proposition. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 735-745.
Lorenzer, Alfred (1986). Tiefenhermeneutische Kulturanalyse. In Hans-Dieter König, Alfred Lorenzer, Heinz Lüdde, Soren Nagbol, Ulrike Prokop, Gunzelin Schmid Noerr & Annelinde Eggert (Eds.), Kultur-Analysen. Psychoanalytische Studien zur Kultur (pp.11-98). Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.
Lustick, Hilary; Yang, Xiaoe & Hakouz, Abeer (2024). The role of emotions in qualitative analysis: researchers' perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 1103-1124, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6232 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Morgan, David (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mruck, Katja & Mey, Günther (2019), Grounded theory methodology and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp.470-496). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Neckel, Sighard (1991). Der Status und Scham. Zur symbolischen Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
Neckel, Sighard & Pritz, Sarah Miriam (2016). Emotion aus kultursoziologischer Perspektive. In Stephan Moebius, Frithjof Nungesser & Katharina Scherke (Eds.), Handbuch Kultursoziologie, Theorien – Methoden – Felder (Vol. 2, pp.305-317). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Nicklich, Manuel; Röbenack, Silke; Sauer, Stefan; Schreyer, Jasmin & Tihlarik, Amelie (2023). Qualitative social research at a distance: Potentials and challenges of virtual interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). Art.15, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4010 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Oltmann, Shannon M. (2016). Qualitative Interviews: A methodological discussion of the interviewer and respondent contexts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 15, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2551 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Ploder, Andrea; Kühner, Angela & Langer, Phil C. (2024). Es ist professionell, Gefühle zu haben. Plädoyer für einen stark reflexiven Umgang mit Affekten und Emotionen in der qualitativen Forschungspraxis. Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik, 48(2), 541-565.
Reichertz, Jo (2015). Die Bedeutung der Subjektivität in der Forschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 33, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2461 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Rogers-Shaw, Carol; Choi, Jinhee & Carr-Chellman, Davin (2021). Understanding and managing the emotional labor of qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(3), Art. 22, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.3.3652 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Rosenthal, Gabriele (1993). Reconstruction of life stories. Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. The Narrative Study of Lives, 1(1), 59-91.
Rosenthal, Gabriele (2018). Interpretative social research: An introduction. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen, https://univerlag.uni-goettingen.de/handle/3/isbn-978-3-86395-374-4 [Accessed: January 24, 2025].
Roth, Wolff-Michael & Breuer, Franz (2003). Reflexivity and subjectivity: A possible road map for reading the special issues. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2), Art. 24, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.697 [Accessed: January 3, 2025].
Ruokonen-Engler, Minna Kristiina (2025). Conducting biographical-narrative interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic: Methodological reflections on situated affective encounters and emotional reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(1), Art. 13, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4357.
Ruokonen-Engler, Minna Kristiina & Siouti, Irini (2013). "Doing biographical reflexivity" as a methodological tool in transnational research settings. Transnational Social Review – A Social Work Journal, 3(2), 247-261.
Ruokonen-Engler, Minna Kristiina & Siouti, Irini (2016). Biographical entanglements, self-reflexivity and transnational knowledge production. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(7), 745-752.
Salling Olesen, Henning (2012). The societal nature of subjectivity: An interdisciplinary methodological challenge. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), Art. 4., https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.3.1908 [Accessed: December 5, 2024].
Scheff, Thomas (1994). Bloody revenge. Emotions, nationalism, and war. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schiek, Daniela (2022). Written online interviews in qualitative social research: On the methodological grounding of a new research practice. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(1), Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-23.1.3754 [Accessed: December 5, 2024].
Schiek, Daniela (2024). Methoden der Qualitativen Forschung. Bielefeld: transcript.
Schütze, Fritz (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis, 13(3), 283-293, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53147 [Accessed: December 5, 2024].
Siouti, Irini (2022). Othering in der qualitativen Migrationsforschung. Herausforderungen und Reflexionen in der Forschungspraxis. In Irini Siouti, Tina Spies, Elisabeth Tuider, Hella von Unger & Erol Yildiz (Eds.), Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis (pp.107-128). Bielefeld: transcript, https://www.transcript-open.de/doi/10.14361/9783839463086-005 [Accessed: December 5, 2024].
Slaby, Jan & von Scheve, Christian (Eds.) (2019). Affective societies. Key concepts. London: Routledge.
Thompson, Vanessa E. (2020). Postkoloniale Ethnographie. Aus der Komfortzone in der Kontaktzone. WestEnd. Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 17(2), 109-121.
Thomson, Alistair (2019). Indexing and interpreting emotion: Joy and shame in oral history. Studies in Oral History, 41, 1-11, https://oralhistoryaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019_journal_full.pdf [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
von Scheve, Christian (2009). Emotionen und soziale Strukturen. Die affektiven Grundlagen sozialer Ordnung. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
von Stetten, Moritz & Brill, Mila (2022). Tagungsessay. Emotionale Relationen in der Feldforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 23(1), Art. 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-23.1.3852 [Accessed: December 5, 2024].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Irini Siouti, Minna Kristiina Ruokonen - Engler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
