Review Essay: Ethnography Lost and Found: Qualitative Methodology Between Science, Art, and Social Powers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.875Keywords:
ethnography, ethnomethodology, Chicago school" of sociology, bureaucratization of science, generality of knowledgeAbstract
The Handbook of Ethnography reviewed here is a thorough treatise of the field as it currently stands—enthusiastically proliferating the uses of qualitative methodology, while remaining disoriented by the role post-modernist thinking has played in the contemporary social sciences. As a result, the uses of qualitative techniques become potential tools for telling journalistic stories, while removing the ideal of science—of creating universal knowledge—from the agenda. It is hoped that the time-honored traditions of ethnography will survive the social pressures of bureaucratization and institutional control over contemporary social sciences. The Handbook also provides an excellent overview of the various research traditions that have emerged from the "Chicago School" of sociological thought. At the same time it fails to represent the ethnographic thought in countries outside of the British-American axis. Nevertheless, the Handbook is a remarkable synthesis of existing thinking in and around of ethnography. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202297Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2002-05-31
How to Cite
Valsiner, J. (2002). Review Essay: Ethnography Lost and Found: Qualitative Methodology Between Science, Art, and Social Powers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.875
Issue
Section
FQS Reviews
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Jaan Valsiner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.