Innovative Anwendungen und künftige Ausrichtungen der Mixed Methods und multimethodischen Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften

Autor/innen

  • Felix Knappertsbusch Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung
  • Margrit Schreier Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
  • Nicole Burzan TU Dortmund
  • Nigel Fielding University of Surrey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2836-049X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4013

Schlagworte:

Mixed Methods, multimethodische Forschung, Entwicklung von Mixed Methods und multimethodischer Forschung, Anwendungen von Mixed Methods und multimethodischer Forschung, Methodologie

Abstract

In diesem Editorial stellen wir den FQS-Schwerpunkt "Mixed Methods und multimethodische Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften: Anwendungen in der gegenwärtigen Forschungslandschaft und künftige Entwicklungen" vor, indem wir zunächst Wandel und Kontinuitäten in diesem Forschungsfeld seit dem Erscheinen von FQS 2(1) "Qualitative und Quantitative Forschung: Übereinstimmungen und Divergenzen" (SCHREIER & FIELDING, 2001) betrachten. Anschließend geben wir einen kurzen historischen Überblick über die Entwicklung methodenintegrativer Forschungsansätze in den letzten 20 Jahren und gelangen so zu einer Darstellung des Status quo. Dabei heben wir die Fortschritte hervor, die Anwender*innen von Mixed Methods und multimethodischer Forschung (MMMF) sowie -Methodolog*innen in verschiedenen Forschungsgebieten erzielt haben. Wir greifen allerdings auch einige der ungelösten Probleme in diesem Feld auf, darunter die wachsende interne Fragmentierung des MMMF-Diskurses sowie die zunehmende Distanz zwischen MMMF-Methodologie und der empirischen Forschungspraxis. Wir schließen mit einer kurzen Vorstellung der 13 hier versammelten Beiträge.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Autor/innen-Biografien

Felix Knappertsbusch, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung

Felix KNAPPERTSBUSCH is a program manager at the Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung [Federal Agency for Civic Education, Project Group Quality Assurance]. He has worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Helmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg and Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, specializing in social research methods and methodology, particularly mixed methods approaches, as well as political sociology, specifically research on prejudice and discrimination, and critical theory.

Margrit Schreier, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Margrit SCHREIER is adjunct professor of empirical research methods at Constructor University, formerly Jacobs University Bremen. In her research, she focuses on qualitative research methods and methodology, mixed methods, media psychology, sensory processing sensitivity, and health-related topics.

Nicole Burzan, TU Dortmund

Nicole BURZAN is professor of sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences at TU Dortmund University. Her research interests are social inequalities, especially from a cultural sociological perspective, sociology of time, and empirical methods/mixed methods. Fields of application are e.g., middle classes, mobility of academics, landlords, musical taste and museums. From 2017 to 2019 she was president of the German Sociological Association. Since 2020 she is (founding) dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences. She is co-editor of the book series "Standards standardisierter und nichtstandardisierter Sozialforschung" [Standards of Standardized and Non-Standardized Empirical Social Research], Beltz Juventa.

Nigel Fielding, University of Surrey

Nigel FIELDING, BA (Sussex), MA (Kent), PhD (LSE), is emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Surrey, a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, and a member of the Community of Experts of the European Science Foundation. His interests in research methodology include mixed methods, socio-spatial methods, qualitative software, interview methods, field observation, and digitally-mediated fieldwork. Nigel has authored/edited 28 books, many in research methodology, including the "Handbook of Online Research Methods" (Sage, 2018, 2nd ed., with BLANK & LEE) and "Merged Methods: A Rationale for Full Integration" (Sage, 2021, with GOBO [lead author], LA ROCCA & VAN DER VAART).

Literaturhinweise

Akremi, Leila & Zanker, Dagmar (2023). Mixing standardized administrative data and survey data with qualitative content analysis in longitudinal designs: Perceptions of justified pensions and related life courses. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 16, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4003.

Alise, Mark A. (2008). Disciplinary differences in preferred research methods: a comparison of groups in the Biglan classification scheme. Dissertation, Department of Educational Theory, Policy, and Practice, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, US, https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2052 [Accessed: August 8, 2022].

Alise, Mark A. & Teddlie, Charles (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126.

Anandarajan, Murugan; Hill, Chelsey & Nolan, Thomas (2019). Practical text analytics: Maximizing the value of text data. Cham: Springer.

Anguera, M. Teresa; Blanco-Villaseñor, Angel; Losada, José L.; Sánchez-Algarra, Pedro & Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. (2018). Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?. Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2757-2770.

Bagele, Chilisa (2020). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Bash, Kirstie L.; Howell Smith, Michelle C.; & Trantham, Pam S. (2021). A systematic methodological review of hierarchical linear modeling in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 190-211.

Baur, Nina, & Hering, Linda (2017). Die Kombination von ethnografischer Beobachtung und standardisierter Befragung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Supplement 2), 387-414.

Baur, Nina; Kelle, Udo & Kuckartz, Udo (Eds.) (2017). Mixed Methods. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Supplement 2).

Bergman, Max M. (Ed.) (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Blaikie, Norman (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.

Brewer, John & Hunter, Albert (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: Synthesizing styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bryman, Alan (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.

Burzan, Nicole (2016). Methodenplurale Forschung. Chancen und Probleme von Mixed Methods. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

Campbell, Donald & Fiske, Donald (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod-matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.

Coates, Adam (2021). The prevalence of philosophical assumptions described in mixed methods research in education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 171-189.

Cram, Fiona & Mertens, Donna M. (2015). Transformative and indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In Sharlene Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp.91-109). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Creswell, John W. & Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2017 [2011]). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Cupchik, Gerald (2001). Constructivist realism: An ontology that encompasses positivist and constructivist approaches to the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 7, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.968 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Denzin, Norman K. (1978). The research act. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Eickelmann, Jennifer & Burzan, Nicole (2023). Challenges of multimethod and mixed methods designs in museum research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 12, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3988.

Fetters, Michael D. & Molina-Azorin, José F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3-10.

Fielding, Nigel (2009). Going out on a limb: Postmodernism and multiple method research. Current Sociology, 57(3), 427-447.

Fielding, Nigel (2010a). Elephants, gold standards and applied qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 123-127.

Fielding, Nigel (2010b). Mixed methods research in the real world. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 127-138.

Fielding, Nigel & Schreier, Margrit (2001). Introduction: On the compatibility between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 4, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.965 [Accessed: July 13, 2022].

Flick, Uwe (2011). Triangulation. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Springer VS.

Flick, Uwe (2017). Mantras and myths: The disenchantment of mixed-methods research and revisiting triangulation as a perspective. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 46-57.

Gallie, Walter B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.

Giddings, Lynne S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag?. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 195-203.

Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela; Seidel, Tina; Rohlfs, Carsten; Gröschner, Alexander & Ziegelbauer, Sascha (Eds.) (2012). Mixed methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung. Münster: Waxmann.

Gobo, Giampietro (2023). Mixed methods and their pragmatic approach: Is there a risk of being entangled in a positivist epistemology and methodology? Limits, pitfalls and consequences of a bricolage methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 13, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4005.

Gobo, Giampietro; Fielding, Nigel; La Rocca, Gevisa; van der Vaart, Wander (Eds.) (2021). Merged methods: A rationale for full integration. London: Sage.

Goertz, Gary (2017). Multimethod research, causal mechanisms, and case studies. An integrated approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goertz, Gary & Mahoney, James (2012). A tale of two cultures. Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Greene, Jennifer C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Greene, Jennifer C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22.

Greene, Jennifer C. (2010). Foreword. Beginning the conversation. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 2-5.

Guba, Egon G. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Guetterman, Timothy C.; Babchuk, Wayne A.; Howell Smith, Michelle C. & Stevens, Jared (2019). Contemporary approaches to mixed methods-grounded theory research: A field-based analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 179-195.

Gutierrez Sanin, Francisco (2001). Imitation games and political discourse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 10, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.971 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Hammersley, Martyn (2002). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In John T. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp.159-174), Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Hammersley, Martyn (2008). Paradigm war revived? On the diagnosis of resistance to randomized controlled trials and systematic review in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(1), 3-10.

Hammersley, Martyn (2018). Commentary—On the "indistinguishability thesis": A response to Morgan. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 256-261.

Hammersley, Martyn (2023). Are there assessment criteria for qualitative findings? A challenge facing mixed methods research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3935.

Hense, Andrea (2023). Combining graphic elicitation methods and narrative family interviews in a qualitative multimethod design. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 6, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3970.

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene (2012). Feminist approaches to triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 137-146.

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene (2015). Introduction: navigating a turbulent research landscape: working the boundaries, tensions, diversity, and contradictions of multimethod and mixed methods inquiry. In Sharlene Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp.xxxiii-liii). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hesse-Biber, Sharlene & Johnson, R. Burke (Eds.) (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hirschauer, Stefan & Völkle, Laura (2017). Denn sie wissen nicht, was sie lehren. "Empirische Sozialforschung" als Etikettenschwindel. Soziologie, 46(4), 417-428.

Hollstein, Betina & Wagemann, Claudius (2014). Fuzzy-set analysis of network data as mixed method: Personal networks and the transition from school to work. In Silvia Domínguez & Betina Hollstein (Eds.), Mixed methods social networks research. Design and applications (pp.237-268), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Howe, Kenneth R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 42-61.

Howell Smith, Michelle C. & Shanahan Bazis, Pamela (2021). Conducting mixed methods research systematic methodological reviews: A review of practice and recommendations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 546-566.

Hunter, Albert & Brewer, John D. (2015). Designing multimethod research. In Sharlene Hesse-Biber & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp.185-205). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hutchinson, Susan R. & Lovell, Cheryl D. (2004). A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 383-403.

Janetzko, Dietmar (2001). Processing raw data both the qualitative and quantitative way. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 11, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.972 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Johnson, R. Burke (2017). Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156-173.

Kansteiner, Katja & König, Stefan (2020). The role(s) of qualitative content analysis in mixed methods research designs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1), Art. 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.1.3412 [Accessed: June 30, 2022].

Kelle, Udo (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 5, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.966 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Kelle, Udo (2008). Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung: Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwisseschaften.

Kelle, Udo & Reith, Florian (2023). Strangers in paradigms!? Alternatives to paradigm-bound methodology and "methodological confessionalism"'. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4015.

Kleining, Gerhard & Witt, Harald (2001). Discovery as basic methodology of qualitative and quantitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 16, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.977 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Knappertsbusch, Felix (2020). ''Fractal heuristics'' for mixed methods research: Applying Abbott's ''fractal distinctions'' as a conceptual metaphor for method integration. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 456-472.

Knappertsbusch, Felix (2023). From paradigm wars to peaceful coexistence? A sociological perspective on the qualitative-quantitative-divide and future directions for mixed methods methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 2, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3966.

Kuckartz, Udo (2014). Mixed Methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Kuiken, Don & Miall, David S. (2001). Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 15, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.976 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

La Rocca, Gevisa (2020). Possible selves of a hashtag: Moving from the theory of speech acts to cultural objects to interpret hashtags, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 12(1), 1-9.

Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Lynham, Susan H. & Guba, Egon G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.97-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

MacCannell, Dean (1992). Empty meeting grounds. The tourist papers. London: Routledge.

Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

Mayring, Philipp (2001). Kombination und Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Analyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 6, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.967 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Mayring, Philipp (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Ein Beispiel für Mixed Methods. In Michaela Gläser-Zikuda, Tina Seidel, Carsten Rohlfs, Alexander Gröschner & Sascha Ziegelbauer (Eds.), Mixed Methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung (pp.27-36). Münster: Waxmann.

Maxwell, Joseph A. (2011). Paradigms or toolkits? Philosophical and methodological positions as heuristics for mixed methods research. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 24(2), 25-30.

Maxwell, Joseph A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 12-27.

Maxwell, Joseph A. (2018). The ''silo problem'' in mixed methods research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 317-327.

Maxwell, Joseph A. (2019). Distinguishing between quantitative and qualitative research: A response to Morgan. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 132-137.

Mejeh, Mathias; Hagenauer, Gerda & Gläser-Zikuda, Michaela (2023). Mixed methods research on learning and instruction—meeting the challenges of multiple perspectives and levels within a complex field. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 14, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3989.

Mertens, Donna M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469-474.

Mertens, Donna M.; Bazeley, Pat; Bowleg, Lisa; Fielding, Nigel; Maxwell, Joseph; Molina-Azorin, Jose F. & Niglas, Katrin (2017). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future: Implications of the Mixed Methods International Research Association's task force report on the future of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221-227.

Morgan, David L. (2018). Living with blurry boundaries: The value of distinguishing between quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268-279.

Morgan, David L. (2019). Commentary—after triangulation, what next?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 6-11.

Morse, Janice & Niehaus, Linda (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. London: Routledge.

Münch, Richard (2018). Soziologie in der Identitätskrise: Zwischen totaler Fragmentierung und Einparadigmenherrschaft. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47(1), 1-6.

Munoz-Najar Galvez, Sebastian; Heiberger, Raphael & McFarland, Daniel (2020). Paradigm wars revisited: A cartography of graduate research in the field of education (1980-2010). American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 612-652.

Niglas, Katrin (2004). The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research. Dissertation, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Tallinn Paedagogical University, Estonia, https://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/en/download/193063 [Accessed: June 30, 2022].

Novello, Noemi (2023). Communities of scholars and mixed methods research: Relationships among fields and researchers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4008.

O'Cathain, Alicia; Murphy, Elizabeth & Nicholl, Jon (2007). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 7, Art. 85, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-85 [Accessed: June 30, 2022].

Odağ, Özen & Mittelstädt, Alexandra (2023). Mixed methods in research on the psychology of the internet and social media (POISM). Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4009.

Payne, Geoff; Williams, Malcolm & Chamberlain, Suzanne (2004). Methodological pluralism in British sociology. Sociology, 38(1), 153-163.

Pivovarova, Margarita; Powers, Jeanne M. & Fischman, Gustavo E. (2020). Moving beyond the paradigm wars: Emergent approaches for education research. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), vii-xvi.

Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods. U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428-440.

Plano Clark, Vicki L. & Ivankova, Nataliya V. (2016). Mixed methods research. A guide to the field. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Römer, Oliver (2019). Wissenschaftslogik und Widerspruch. Die Esser-Hirschauer-Kontroverse. Soziologiehistorische und systematische Überlegungen zu einem "Methodenstreit". Zeitschrift für Theoretische Soziologie, 8(2), 220-244.

Ryan, Anne & Gobo, Giampietro (2011). Managing the decline of globalized methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(6), 411-415.

Schmitt, Annette; Mees, Ulrich & Laucken, Uwe (2001). Logographische Analyse sozial prozessierender Texte. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 14, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.975 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Schneider, Carsten Q. & Rohlfing, Ingo (2013). Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), 559-597.

Schoonenboom, Judith (2023). The fundamental difference between qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 11, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.3986.

Schreier, Margrit (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage.

Schreier, Margrit & Fielding, Nigel (Eds.) (2001). Thematic issue: Qualitative and quantitative research: Conjunctions and divergences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/26 [Accessed: October 21, 2022].

Schreier, Margrit & Odağ, Özen (2020). Mixed methods. In Günter Mey & Katja Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp.159-184). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Silver, Christina & Lewins, Ann (2017). Using software in qualitative research. London: Sage.

Stolz, Jörg (2017). Milieus and mixed methods: Describing and explaining religion and secularity in Switzerland. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 361-386.

Symonds, Jennifer & Gorard, Stephen (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(2),121-136.

Tanner, Pascal (2023). Nested sampling in sequential mixed methods designs: Comparing recipe and result. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 17, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4004.

Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles (Eds.) (2010 [2003]). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Teddlie, Charles & Tashakkori, Abbas (2020 [2009]). Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Timans, Rob; Wouters, Paul & Heilbron, Johan (2019). Mixed methods research: What it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193-216.

Truscott, Diane M.; Swars, Susan; Smith, Stephanie; Thornton-Reid, Flo; Zhao, Yali; Dooley, Caitlin; Williams, Brian; Hart, Lynn & Matthews, Mona (2010). A cross-disciplinary examination of the prevalence of mixed methods in educational research 1995-2005. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 317-328.

Uprichard, Emma & Dawney, Leila (2019). Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19-32.

Vogl, Susanne (2023). Mixed methods longitudinal research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1), Art. 21, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4012.

Westmarland, Nicole (2001). The quantitative/qualitative debate and feminist research: A subjective view of objectivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 13, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.974 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Williams, Malcolm; Sloan, Luke & Brookfield, Charlotte (2017). A tale of two sociologies: Analyzing versus critique in UK sociology. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 132-151.

Witt, Harald (2001). Forschungsstrategien bei quantitativer und qualitativer Sozialforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 8, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.969 [Accessed: October 26, 2022].

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2023-01-31

Zitationsvorschlag

Knappertsbusch, F., Schreier, M., Burzan, N., & Fielding, N. (2023). Innovative Anwendungen und künftige Ausrichtungen der Mixed Methods und multimethodischen Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.1.4013

Ausgabe

Bd. 24 Nr. 1 (2023): Mixed Methods und multimethodische Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften: Anwendungen in der gegenwärtigen Forschungslandschaft und künftige Entwicklungen

Rubrik

Mixed Methods und multimethodische Forschung in den Sozialwissenschaften

Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2023 Margrit Schreier, Felix Knappertsbusch, Nicole Burzan, Nigel Fielding

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.

Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in

<< < 1 2