Anhören von Interviews: Berücksichtigung von Auralität, Emotionen und Atmosphären in der qualitativen Analyse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.1.4345Schlagworte:
Emotionen, Auralität; Anhören; , Anhören, Interviewaufnahme, AudiokodierungAbstract
Obwohl Soziolog*innen Interviews gewöhnlich aufzeichnen, verwenden sie für das Kodieren und die Analyse meistens die Transkriptionen anstatt der Tonbandaufzeichnungen. Die Transkription des Tons in einen Text erfolgt in der qualitativen Forschung häufig als ein unhinterfragter und nahezu heiliger Arbeitsschritt. Angesichts der Fortschritte im Bereich der künstlichen Intelligenz, der Ethik und neuerer konzeptioneller Perspektiven, welche die Wissensproduktion herausfordern, lohnt es sich jedoch der Frage, was bei der Transkription verloren geht, erneut nachzugehen. In diesem Artikel möchte ich zum Anhören von Interviews – also zur Anwendung von Daten, die zu hören sind – in der qualitativen Forschung anregen. Ich stelle praktische, ethische und konzeptionelle Überlegungen dar, die mit der Analyse von Interviewaufzeichnungen einhergehen und erörtere, warum Forschende sich bisher auf Transkripte verlassen haben und welche möglichen Unzulänglichkeiten mit dieser Vorgehensweise verbunden sind. Ich argumentiere, dass Forschende, die an der Tradition festhalten, nur mit dem Transkript zu arbeiten, unnötigerweise reichhaltige Schichten von sensorischen, emotionalen und verkörperten Daten übersehen. Stattdessen schlage ich vor, das Anhören als eine der Schlüsselmethoden zu nutzen, um die konstitutive Rolle von Emotionen und Atmosphären in der qualitativen Forschung zu rekonstruieren.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Abrahams, Hilary (2017). Listen to me: A reflection on practice in qualitative interviewing. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(2), 253-259.
Anderson, Ben (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotions, Space, and Society, 2(2), 77-81.
Anderson, Kathryn & Jack, Dana C. (2016 [1998]). Learning to listen. Interview techniques and analyses. In Robert Perks & Alistair Thomson (Eds.), The oral history reader (3rd ed., pp.11-26). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ashmore, Malcolm & Reed, Darren (2000). Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 3, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.3.1020 [Accessed: July 25, 2024].
Ayaß, Ruth (2015). Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 505-528.
Back, Les (2023). Listening, with Les Back. Uncommon Sense, January 20, https://www.uncommonsensepodcast.org/1940580/episodes/12053380-listening-with-les-back [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Bamberg, Michael & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377-396.
Becker, Johannes; Pohn-Lauggas, Maria & Santos, Hermilio (2023). Introduction: Reconstructive biographical research. Current Sociology, 71(4), 552-566.
Bokhove, Christian & Downey, Christoper (2018). Automated generation of "good enough" transcripts as a first step to transcription of audio-recorded data. Methodological Innovations, 11(2),1-14, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2059799118790743 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Bornat, Joanna (2010). Remembering and reworking emotions: The reanalysis of emotion in an interview. Oral History, 38(2), 43-52.
Brownlie, Julie (2011). Not "going there": Limits to the professionalisation of our emotional lives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(1), 130-144.
Bull, Michael & Back, Les (2016) Introduction. In Michael Bull & Les Back (Eds.) (2016). The auditory culture reader (pp.1-28). London: Bloomsbury Academic,.
Chandler, Rasheeta; Anstey, Erica & Ross, Henry (2015). Listening to voices and visualizing data in qualitative research: Hypermodal dissemination possibilities. SAGE Open, 5(2), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244015592166 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Clifford, James & Marcus, George (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Collins, Harry, Leonard-Clarke, Willow & O'Mahoney, Hannah (2016). "Um, er": How meaning varies between speech and its typed transcript. Qualitative Research, 19(6), 653-668.
Cottingham, Marci D. & Erickson, Rebecca J. (2020). Capturing emotion with audio diaries. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 549-564.
Craig, Shelley L.; McInroy, Lauren B.; Goulden, Ami & Eaton, Andrew D. (2021). Engaging the senses in qualitative research via multimodal coding: Triangulating transcript, audio, and video data in a study with sexual and gender minority youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-12, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/16094069211013659 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Crichton, Susan & Childs, Elizabeth (2005). Clipping and coding audio files: A research method to enable participant voice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(3), 40-49, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/160940690500400303 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Davidson, Christina (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35-52, https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800206 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Daza, Stephanie & Gershon, Walter S. (2015). Beyond ocular inquiry: Sound, silence, and sonification. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 639-644.
Derrida, Jacques (1978 [1967]). Writing and difference (transl. by A. Bass). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Flint, Maureen A. (2022). More-than-human methodologies in qualitative research: Listening to the leafblower. Qualitative Research, 22(4), 521-541.
Gallagher, Michael (2020). Voice audio methods. Qualitative Research, 20(4), 449-464.
Gammerl, Benno (2015). Can you feel your research results? How to deal with and gain insights from emotions generated in oral history interviews. In Helena Flam & Jochen Kleres (Eds.), Methods of exploring emotion (pp.153-162). London: Routledge.
Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (1968 [1967]). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Green, Judith; Franquiz, Maria & Dixon, Carol (1997). Myth of the objective transcript. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 172-176.
Guschke, Bontu Lucie (2023). Fire inside me—Exploring the possibilities of embodied queer listening. Culture and Organization, 29(6), 564-581.
Hall, Tom; Lashua, Brett & Coffey, Amanda (2008). Sound and the everyday in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(6), 1019-1040.
Hammersley, Martin (2010). Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 553-569.
Holmes, Katie (2017). Does it matter if she cried? Recording emotion and the Australian Generations Oral History Project. The Oral History Review, 44(1), 56-76,
Holmes, Mary (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139-154.
Howes, David (1991). The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ikonen, Essi (2022). The sonic meanings of the life and death of my disabled brother: Listening as a method for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 32(13), 2019-2029.
Jackson, Alecia Y. & Mazzei, Lisa A. (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research. London: Routledge.
Kingston, Sarah (2024). Audio research methods, attitudes, and accessibility theory: Using audio vignettes to elicit attitudes towards sex work. Qualitative Research, 24(3), 647-668.
Lavee, Einat & Itzchakov, Guy (2023). Good listening: A key element in establishing quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 614-631.
Lefebvre, Henri (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time, and everyday life. London: Continuum.
MacLure, Maggie (2009). Broken voices, dirty words: On the productive insufficiency of voice. In Alecia Y. Jackson & Lisa A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp.97-113). London: Routledge.
Mazzei, Lisa A. (2009). An impossibility of full voice. In Alecia Y. Jackson & Lisa A. Mazzei (2009). Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp.45-62). London: Routledge.
Mero-Jaffe, Irit (2011). "Is that what I said?" Interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 231-247, https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000304 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Moore, Niamh (2012). The politics and ethics of naming: Questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(4), 331-340.
Nascimento, Liandro da Silva & Steinbruch, Fernanda Kalil (2019). "The interviews were transcribed", but how? Reflections on management research. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 413-429.
Poland, Blake D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290-310.
Pomerantz, Anita & Fehr, Barbara J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp.64-91). London: Sage.
Richardson, Emma; Haworth, Kate & Deamer, Felicity (2022). For the record: Questioning transcription processes in legal contexts. Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 677-697.
Saldaña, Johnny (2015). Coding and analysis strategies. In Patricia Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp.581-605). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Stonehouse, Paul (2019). The unnecessary prescription of transcription: The promise of audio-coding in interview research. Research in Outdoor Education, 17(3), 1-19, https://digitalcommons.cortland.edu/reseoutded/vol17/iss1/3/ [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
't Hart, Dorinda (2023). COVID times make "deep listening" explicit: Changing the space between interviewer and participant. Qualitative Research, 23(2), 306-322.
Tessier, Sophie (2012). From field notes, to transcripts, to tape recordings: Evolution or combination?. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 446-460, https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100410 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Thomson, Alistair (2019). Indexing and interpreting emotion: Joy and shame in oral history. Studies in Oral History, 41, 1-11, https://oralhistoryaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019_journal_full.pdf [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Tilley, Liz & Woodthorpe, Kate (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11(2), 197-212.
Tilley, Susan A. & Powick, Kelly D. (2002). Distanced data: Transcribing other people's research tapes. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(2 & 3), 291-310.
Wainwright, Megan & Russell, Andrew (2010). Using NVivo audio-coding: Practical, sensorial and epistemological considerations. Social Research Update, 60, 1-5.
Werner, Cosima; Meyer, Frank & Bischof, Susann (2023). Foundations, strategies, and techniques of anonymizing transcripts in qualitative research: A practice-oriented introduction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(3), Art. 12, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4067 [Accessed: September 22, 2024].
Wettergren, Åsa (2015). How do we know what they feel?. In Helena Flam & Jochen Kleres (Eds.), Methods of exploring emotions (pp.115-124). London: Routledge.
Whitehouse, Andrew (2017). Loudly sing cuckoo: More-than-human seasonalities in Britain. The Sociological Review, 65(1), 171-187.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashley Barnwell
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
