Fuzzy Fields. Multi-Sited Ethnography in Sociological Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.22Keywords:
methodology, sociological ethnography, fieldworkAbstract
Doing participating observation in the "field" is an indispensable characteristic of ethnography. Yet, the problems of constructing a field for ethnographic research attract surprisingly little attention in textbooks and research reports. Sociological ethnography does hardly ever aim at giving holistic representations of clearly bounded (small) groups. It rather focuses on certain theoretically defined aspects of a given culture. Therefore, defining and delineating a field becomes a crucial step in an empirical study. In our article we propose a concept of the field as social world(s) constituted by a set of actors focused on a common concern. With the example of our ongoing research project on exclusion and integration in welfare and economy we argue for a multi-sited approach, which traces its inherently fragmented and multiply situated research object across social worlds. We discuss the problems arising from such a strategy and discuss the function of the field in theory driven sociological ethnography. We contend that multi-sited ethnography is particularly suited for building empirically grounded sociological theories. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503288Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2005-09-30
How to Cite
Nadai, E., & Maeder, C. (2005). Fuzzy Fields. Multi-Sited Ethnography in Sociological Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.22
Issue
Section
Innovations in Special Methods
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Eva Nadai, Christoph Maeder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.