Transgressing the Linguistic Domain: The Transformative Power of Images in Magnus Hirschfeld's Sexological Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.2.3975Keywords:
visual analysis, visual sociology, visual data, grounded theory methodology, discourse analysis, transgender, homosexualityhermaphroditism, queer, sexologyAbstract
Transgender individuals have historically faced exclusion from social research, a systemic issue rooted in a lack of historical information. However, a comprehensive understanding of contemporary transness necessitates examining its history. In this article, I address early forms of visual representation of transness by focusing on HIRSCHFELD's sexological work on intermediate sex categories at the beginning of the 20th century. The objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, I examine visual methods derived from discourse analysis and grounded theory methodology for analyzing and interpreting images as cultural documents. Secondly, I apply a discourse-analytical research perspective and follow suggestions made by CLARKE (2005) to explore the influence of images on the development of discourse on transness. By demonstrating the diverse meanings conveyed through HIRSCHFELD's image use, which sometimes differ significantly from his written work, I illustrate that images have the potential to shape and transform social knowledge production beyond the linguistic domain. I conclude with suggestions for advancing methods in the field of visual sociology.
Downloads
References
Barthes, Roland (1973 [1957]). Mythologies. London: Paladin Books.
Betscher, Silke (2013). Bildmuster – Wissensmuster. Ansätze einer korpusbasierten Visuellen Diskursanalyse. Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 35, 285-319.
Bleiker, Roland (2015). Pluralist methods for visual global politics. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 872-890.
Boehm, Gottfried (2008). Wie Bilder Sinn erzeugen. Die Macht des Zeigens. Berlin: Berlin University Press.
Bohnsack, Ralf (2008). The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 26, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1171 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Breckner, Roswitha (2010). Sozialtheorie des Bildes. Zur interpretativen Analyse von Bildern und Fotografien. Bielefeld: transcript.
Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Christmann, Gabriela B. (2008). The power of photographs of buildings in the Dresden urban discourse. Towards a visual discourse analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 11, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1163 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Clarke, Adele (2005). Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage.
Clarke, Adele (2012). Situationsanalyse. Grounded Theory nach dem Postmodern Turn. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Eriksson, Päivi & Kovalainen, Anne (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: Sage.
Fairclough, Norman (1995). Media discourse. London: Arnold.
Forceville, Charles (1999). Educating the eye?: Kress and van Leeuwen's Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996). Language and Literature, 8(2), 163-178.
Foucault, Michel (1989 [1961]). Wahnsinn und Gesellschaft. Eine Geschichte des Wahnsinns im Zeitalter der Vernunft. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Foucault, Michel (1990 [1966]). Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1986 [1959]). Vom Zirkel des Verstehens. In Hans-Georg Gadamer, Gesammelte Werke: Wahrheit und Methode (pp.57-65). Tübingen: Mohr.
Glaser, Barney G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, Barney G. (1998). Doing grounded theory. Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
Halberstam, J. Jack (1998). Female masculinity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hart, Christopher (2016). The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 335-350.
Herrn, Rainer (2005). Schnittmuster des Geschlechts. Transvestismus und Transsexualität in der frühen Sexualwissenschaft. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag.
Hirschauer, Stefan (2015 [1993]). Die soziale Konstruktion der Transsexualität. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1899). Die objektive Diagnose der Homosexualität. Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Homosexualität, 1, 1-35.
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1903). Ursachen und Wesen des Uranismus. Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Homosexualität, 5, 1-193.
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1910). Die Transvestiten. Eine Untersuchung über den erotischen Verkleidungstrieb. Berlin: Pulvermacher.
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1923). Die intersexuelle Konstitution. In Wolfgang Schmidt & Magnus Hirschfeld (Eds.), Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen (pp.9-26). Frankfurt/M.: Qumran.
Hirschfeld, Magnus & Tilke, Max (1912). Der erotische Verkleidungstrieb (Die Transvestiten), illustrierter Teil. Berlin: Pulvermacher.
Jewitt, Carey & Oyama, Rumiko (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In Theo Van Leeuwen & Caret Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp.134-156). London: Sage.
Johnstone, Barbara (2018 [2002]). Discourse analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Kautt, York (2017). Grounded Theory als Methodologie und Methode der Analyse visueller Kommunikation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), Art. 8, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2859 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Keller, Reiner (2011 [2004]). Diskursforschung. Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2005). Wissenssoziologie. Konstanz: UVK.
Knoblauch, Hubert; Baer, Alejandro; Laurier, Eric; Petschke, Sabine & Schnettler, Bernt (2008). Visual analysis. New developments in the interpretative analysis of video and photography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 14, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1170 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Konecki, Krzysztof (2011). Visual grounded theory: A methodological outline and examples from empirical work. Revija za Sociologiju, 41(2), 131-160.
Koyama, Emi (2003). The transfeminist manifesto. In Rory Cooke Dicker & Alison Piepmeier (Eds.), Catching a wave. Reclaiming feminism for the 21st century (pp.244-259). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Krafft-Ebing, Richard von (1886). Psychopathia Sexualis. Stuttgart: Enke.
Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen, Theo (2021 [1996]). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Lichtman, Marilyn (2002). Review: Gillian Rose (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(4), Art. 30, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.798 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Lim, Fei Victor (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In O'Halloran, Kay L. (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis (pp.220-246). London: Continuum.
Lünenborg, Margreth & Maier, Tanja (2013). Gender media studies. Konstanz: UVK.
Maasen, Sabine; Mayerhauser, Torsten & Renggli, Cornelia (2006). Bilder als Diskurse – Bilddiskurse. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Machin, David (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies?. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 347-355.
Malherbe, Nick; Suffla, Shahnaaz; Seedat, Mohamed & Bawa, Umed (2016). Visually negotiating hegemonic discourse through photovoice: Understanding youth representations of safety. Discourse & Society, 27(6), 589-606.
Mey, Günter & Dietrich, Marc (2016). From text to image—shaping a visual grounded theory methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), Art. 2, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2535 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Mitchell, William John Thomas (1994). Picture theory. Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Morse, Janice M.; Noerager Stern, Phyllis; Corbin, Juliet M.; Bowers, Barbara; Charmaz, Kathy & Clarke, Adele E. (2009). Developing grounded theory. The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
O'Halloran, Kay L. (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Peez, Georg (2006). Fotoanalyse nach Verfahrensregeln der Objektiven Hermeneutik. In Winfried Marotzki & Horst Niesyto (Eds.), Bildinterpretation und Bildverstehen. Methodische Ansätze aus sozialwissenschaftlicher, kunst- und medienpädagogischer Perspektive (pp.121-141). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Peters, Kathrin (2010). Rätselbilder des Geschlechts. Körperwissen und Medialität um 1900. Zürich: Diaphanes.
Rose, Gillian (2001). Visual methodologies. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Runte, Annette (1996). Biographische Operationen. Diskurse der Transsexualität. München: Fink.
Saalfeld, Robin K. (2020). Transgeschlechtlichkeit und Visualität. Sichtbarkeitsordnungen in Medizin, Subkultur und Spielfilm. Bielefeld: transcript.
Schnettler, Bernt & Raab, Jürgen (2008). Interpretative visual analysis. Developments, state of the art and pending problems. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 31, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1149 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Scholz, Sylka; Kusche, Michel; Scherber, Nicole; Scherber, Sandra & Stiller, David (2014). Das Potenzial von Filmanalysen für die (Familien-) Soziologie. Eine methodische Betrachtung anhand der Verfilmungen von "Das doppelte Lottchen". Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(1), Art. 15, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-15.1.2026 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Seko, Yukari (2013). Picturesque wounds: A multimodal analysis of self-injury photographs on Flickr. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2), Art. 22, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1935 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Stammberger, Birgit (2017). Körperliche Materialität. Zur Kritik des Geschlechterkonstruktivismus. In Christoph Behrens & Andrea Zittlau (Eds.), Queer-Feministische Perspektiven auf Wissen(schaft) (pp.82-121). Rostock: Universität Rostock, https://doi.org/10.18453/rosdok_id00000110 [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Straube, Wibke (2014). Trans cinema and its exit scapes. A transfeminist reading of utopian sensibility and gender dissidence in contemporary film. Linköping: Linköping University Press, http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:742465/FULLTEXT02.pdf [Accessed: October 5, 2022].
Strauss, Anselm L. (1978). A social world perspective. In Norman Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (pp.119-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Strauss, Anselm L. (1991 [1987]). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.
Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet M. (1998 [1990]). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stryker, Susan (2017 [2008]). Transgender history. The roots of today's revolution. New York, NY: Seal Press.
Sykora, Katharina (2004). Umkleidekabinen des Geschlechts. Sexualmedizinische Fotografie im frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Fotogeschichte. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Ästhetik der Fotografie, 24, 15-30.
Traue, Boris; Blanc, Mathias & Cambre, Carolina (2019). Visibilities and visual discourses: Rethinking the social with the image. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(4), 327-337.
Ulrichs, Karl-Heinrich (1994 [1864-1879]). Forschungen über das Räthsel der mannmännlichen Liebe. Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel.
Van Leeuwen, Theo (1991). Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media & Culture, 5(1), 76-114.
Vetter, Brigitte (2010). Transidentität – ein unordentliches Phänomen. Bern: Hans Huber Hogrefe.
Voss, Heinz-Jürgen (2010). Making sex revisited. Dekonstruktion des Geschlechts aus biologisch-medizinischer Perspektive. Bielefeld: transcript.
Wekesa, Nyongesa Ben (2012). Cartoons can talk? Visual analysis of cartoons on the 2007/2008 post-election violence in Kenya: A visual argumentation approach. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 223-238.
Westphal, Carl (1869). Die conträre Sexualempfindung. Symptom eines neuropathischen (psychopathischen) Zustands. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 2, 73-108.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Robin Saalfeld
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
