Audibility and Intelligibility of Talk in Passing-By Interactions: A Methodological Puzzle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-25.3.4207Keywords:
conversation analysis, multimodality, video-based fieldwork, hospital staff, corridor talk, passing-by interactions, multi-location sound recordings, audibility, intelligibilityAbstract
A central assumption of conversation and multimodal analysts is that the participants have sensorial access to the acoustic features, most notably talk, of the studied interactions, which are available thanks to the recordings. If speakers stand in close proximity, a microphone is placed between or on one of them, and the analyst considers that the resulting recording captures the sound that is relevant both for the participants and for research purposes. The study of mobile and spatially distributed interactions comes with a challenge: If speakers are not spatially close but apart from each other, what is the relevant sound for the researcher to collect and examine? In this article, we show that prosodic, compositional and sequential features of the same segment of talk sound differently depending on the exact location of the hearer, or recording device, which is relevant for the analyst as well as for the participants. Our study was based on a corpus of hospital staff corridor interactions captured with a set-up composed of four video-cameras and eight wireless microphones operating simultaneously.
Downloads
References
Ashmore, Malcolm & Reed, Darren (2000). Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 3, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.3.1020 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Ashmore, Malcolm; MacMillan, Katie & Brown, Steven D. (2004). It's a scream: Professional hearing and tape fetishism. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 349-374.
Bjelić, Dušan (2019). "Hearability" versus "hearership": Comparing Garfinkel's and Schegloff's accounts of the summoning phone. Human Studies, 42(4), 695-716.
Coulter, Jeff & Parsons (Ed.) (1990). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry, 33(3), 251-272.
De Stefani, Elwys & Mondada, Lorenza (2014). Reorganizing mobile formations: When "guided" participants initiate reorientations in guided tours. Space and Culture, 17(2), 157-175.
Drew, Paul (1997). "Open" class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69-101.
Gibson, Will & vom Lehn, Dirk (2021). Introduction: The senses in social interaction. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 3-9, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/symb.539 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Glenn, Phillip J.; LeBaron, Curtis D. & Mandelbaum, Jenny (2003). Studies in language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goffman, Erving (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Goffman, Erving (1963), Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Goico, Sara; Gan, Yumei; Katila, Julia & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2021). Capturing multisensoriality: Introduction to a special issue on sensoriality in video-based fieldwork. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3), 1-13, https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/128144 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
González-Martínez, Esther (2023). "Faire du coude" avec un énoncé "il y a x": Inciter à l'action et recruter une personne responsable d'agir en milieu hospitalier ["Nudging" using the phrase "there is x": Prompting action and recruiting a person responsible for action in a hospital setting]. Langage et Société, 179(2), 111-139.
González-Martínez, Esther; Bangerter, Adrian & Lê Van, Kim (2017). Passing-by "Ça va?" checks in clinic corridors. Semiotica, 215, 1-42.
González-Martínez, Esther; Bangerter, Adrian; Lê Van, Kim & Navarro, Cécile (2016). Hospital staff corridor conversations: Work in passing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(3), 521-532.
Goodwin, Charles (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522.
Groeber, Simone & Pekarek Doehler, Simona (2012). Hearing impaired adolescents in a regular classroom: On the embodied accomplishment of participation and understanding. In Maria Egbert & Arnulf Deppermann (Eds.), Hearing aids communication: Integrating social interaction, audiology and user centered design to improve communication with hearing loss and hearing technologies (pp.76-89). Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, http://www.verlag-gespraechsforschung.de/2012/egbert.html [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Haddington, Pentti; Eilittä, Tiina; Kamunen, Antti; Kohonen-Aho, Laura; Oittinen, Tuire; Rautiainen, Lira & Vatanen, Anna (Eds.) (2023). Ethnomethodological conversation analysis in motion: Emerging methods and new technologies. London: Routledge
Heinemann, Trine & Rauniomaa, Mirka (2016). Turning down sound to turn to talk: Muting and muffling auditory objects as a resource for displaying involvement. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 17, 1-28, http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2016/ga-heinemann.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Hochuli, Kenan (2019). Turning the passer-by into a customer: Multi-party encounters at a market stall. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(4), 427-447.
Hoey, Elliot M. (2023). Anticipatory initiations: The use of a presumed reason-for-the-interaction in face-to-face openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 209, 41-55.
Jefferson, Gail (1986). Notes on "latency" in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9(2-3), 153-184, https://liso-archives.liso.ucsb.edu/Jefferson/Latency.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail (2010). Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1476-1484.
Keevallik, Leelo & Ogden, Richard (2020). Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1-18, https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/155325/8/Sounds_on_the_Margins_of_Language_at_the_Heart_of_Interaction.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Kendon, Adam (1976). The F-formation system: The spatial organization of social encounters. Man-Environment Systems, 6(5), pp. 291-296.
La Valle, Natalia (2014). Les corps, les mots, les choses: Particules discursives et "trajectoires parlées" dans l'ordonnancement de la vie domestique [Bodies, words, things: Discourse particles and "spoken trajectories" in the arrangement of domestic life]. In Lorenza Mondada (Ed.), Corps en interaction: Participation, spatialité, mobilité [Bodies in interaction: Participation, spatiality, mobility] (pp.259-288). Lyon: ENS Editions.
Laurier, Eric; Whyte, Angus & Buckner, Kathy (2001). An ethnography of a neighborhood café: Informality, table arrangements and background noise. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2(2), 195-232.
Laurier, Eric; Muñoz, Daniel; Miller, Rebekah & Brown, Barry (2020). A Bip, a beeeep, and a beep beep: How horns are sounded in Chennai traffic. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(3), 341-356.
Lee, John R.E. (1987). Prologue: Talking organisation. In Graham Button & John R.E. Lee (Ed.), Talk and social organisation (pp.19-53). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Licoppe, Christian (2010). The "crisis of the summons": A transformation in the pragmatics of "notifications," from phone rings to instant messaging. The Information Society, 26(4), 288-302.
Luff, Paul & Heath, Christian (2012). Some "technical challenges" of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 255-279.
McIlvenny, Paul & Davidsen, Jacob (2017). A big video manifesto: Re-sensing video and audio. Nordicom-Information, 39(2), 15-21, https://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/kapitel-pdf/mcilvenny_davidsen.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Merlino, Sara (2021). Making sounds visible in speech-language therapy for aphasia. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3), 1-30, https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/128151 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Merlino, Sara; Mondada, Lorenza & Söderström, Ola (2022). Walking through the city soundscape: An audio-visual analysis of sensory experience for people with psychosis. Visual Communication, 22(1), 71-95, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14703572211052638 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Modaff, John V. & Modaff, Daniel P. (2000). Technical notes on audio recordings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(1), 101-118.
Mondada, Lorenza (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab & Hans-Georg Soeffner (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (51-67). Bern: Peter Lang.
Mondada, Lorenza (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194-225.
Mondada, Lorenza (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977-1997.
Mondada, Lorenza (2021). Orchestrating multi-sensoriality in tasting sessions: Sensing bodies, normativity, and language. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 63-86.
Ochs, Elinor (1979). Transcription as theory. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp.43-72). New York, NY: Academic Press, https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/ochs/articles/ochs1979.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Psathas, George (1990). Introduction. Methodological issues and recent developments in the study of naturally occurring interaction. In George Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp.1-29). Washington D.C.: University Press of America.
Psathas, George & Anderson, Timothy (1990). The "practices" of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78(1-2), 75-99.
Rauniomaa, Mirka & Heinemann, Trine (2014). Organising the soundscape: Participants' orientation to impending sound when turning on auditory objects in interaction. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality and social activity (pp.145-168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Relieu, Marc (2023). Teaching and learning how to identify an audible order in traffic: Street-crossing instructional sequences for the visually impaired. In Sara Keel (Ed.), Medical and healthcare interactions: Members' competence and socialization (pp.152-175). London: Routledge.
Sacks, Harvey (1984). Notes on methodology. In John Heritage & J. Maxwell Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735, https://liso-archives.liso.ucsb.edu/Jefferson/systematics_Schenkein.pdf [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1-63, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/overlapping-talk-and-the-organization-of-turntaking-for-conversation/D12AD4181BEEFB073869BE7C55B07660 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharrock, Wes & Coulter, Jeff (1998). On what we can see. Theory and Psychology, 8(2), 147-164.
Smith, Michael Sean (2021). Achieving mutual accessibility through the coordination of multiple perspectives in open, unstructured landscapes. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3), 1-24, https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/128178 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Walker, Gareth (2017). Visual representations of acoustic data: A survey and suggestions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(4), 363-387.
Weeks, Peter (2002). Performative error-correction in music: A problem for ethnomethodological description. Human Studies, 25(3), 359-385.
Yagi, Junichi (2021). Embodied micro-transitions: A single-case analysis of an amateur band studio session. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(4), 1-28, https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/128655 [Accessed: July 29, 2024].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Esther González Martínez, Jakub Mlynář
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
