Review Essay: Making a Mess with Situational Analysis?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.2.432Keywords:
situational analysis, grounded theory, multiple social processes, postmodernism, pragmatism, post-essentialism, relational analysisAbstract
Adele CLARKE, a student of grounded theory co-founder Anselm STRAUSS, uses situational analysis to develop both a methodology and a method which is able to represent the field's messiness, i.e., its heterogeneous and complex character. Grounded theory, CLARKE's starting point, is stuck in a modernist world-view, particularly by looking too much for a pure and oversimplified "basic social process". In order to make grounded theory post-modern, CLARKE considers discourses that are beyond pragmatism, e.g., those initiated by FOUCAULT, LATOUR, HARAWAY. This review essay argues that even though there remain some uncertainties in engaging in this epistemological hybrid, situational analysis provides a very good instrument for researchers to come into their material more deeply and, therefore, is a convincing tool for practice-oriented social science working with qualitative methods. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs080244Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2008-05-31
How to Cite
Mathar, T. (2008). Review Essay: Making a Mess with Situational Analysis?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.2.432
Issue
Section
FQS Reviews
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Tom Mathar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.