Review Essay: Inside the Ghost Train of Collective Identity. Lutz Niethammer's Criticism of the Concept's Boom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.734Keywords:
collective identity, personal identity, theory, history of a concept, identity politics, interdisciplinary approachAbstract
NIETHAMMER offers an extensive, very critical, multifaceted and stimulating view on the successful history of the concept of identity. First, he indicates some early traces of that concept in the work of some outstanding intellectuals from the beginning of the 20th century. Since these early traces are already about collective identity, NIETHAMMER denies the common view, that after World War II, the concept of collective identity was developed from that of personal identity. Even in early manifestations of collective identity, the concept was situated in very different contexts. He regards identity as a "plastic word"—rich in connotations that cover more than it grasps. Because of that reason, (and backed by his analysis of the recent boom in the concept's usage), NIETHAMMER sharply criticizes collective identity as a notion that he would prefer to see abandoned. His strong criticism, however, doesn't fully apply to all variations of collective identity that he mentions. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0302476Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-05-31
How to Cite
Rost, D. (2003). Review Essay: Inside the Ghost Train of Collective Identity. Lutz Niethammer’s Criticism of the Concept’s Boom. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-4.2.734
Issue
Section
FQS Reviews
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Dietmar Rost
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.